User talk:Jbbirwin
Jbbirwin, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Jbbirwin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Karl Grossman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Yellow Springs
- Nathaniel Dorsky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Yellow Springs
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Richard Kaplan (film producer) has a new comment
[edit]
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Coretta Scott King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Yellow Springs
- Nonstop Liberal Arts Institute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Faculty
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Julia Reichert) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Julia Reichert.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
IMDb is not a reliable source, even when you spell it INDb.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 03:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Coretta Scott King Center for Cultural and Intellectual Freedom) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Coretta Scott King Center for Cultural and Intellectual Freedom.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The focus on local news sources in the references had me a bit concerned about the subject's notability–I was able to easily find more coverage online in major publications so there's no issue with the article, but you may want to cite more non-local sources for articles that you write in the future.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 17:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Kaplan (film producer) has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SITH (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)A page you started (Richard Kaplan (film producer)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Richard Kaplan (film producer).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for starting the new article on Richard Kaplan (film producer).
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Prexy Nesbitt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no evidence of any particular notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 09:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |