User talk:Jbaker.mk

Wroughton

Hi Jbaker, I have reverted your edit today of the article on Wroughton relating to the 'Small is Beautiful' campaign. The allegations against possibly identifiable individuals are potentisally libelous and even if they could be substantiated by a citation the inclusion in a Wikipedia article could leave Wikipedia open to legal action on grounds of defamation. See WP:LIBEL. You clearly have some strong views on this subject and from the content and nature of your edits it gives the impression that you may have a close connection with the community activities and political issues being debated in Wroughton. Incorporating your personally held views into your edits is likely to end in reversion. This may or may not be the case, however as a new contributor to Wikipedia I thought it would be helpful to draw to your attention to WP:CIO and WP:RS. A core tenet of Wikipedia is that it is about verifiability not truth this can be hard to work with but it is critical to Wikipedia's credibility that everyone who edits for the Project takes this to heart. In the meantime if I can be of any help please let me know.Tmol42 (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Woughton. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Your persistence in re adding blatantly biased and improperly cited material about living persons and ignoring the advice about how to edit in accordance with Wp standards Tmol42 (talk) 00:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]