User talk:Jb423
Blocked again
[edit]I am disappointed that you continued to mark all your edits as minor after our last conversation. I have blocked you again. The reason it is disruptive is that some editors do not inspect minor edits that appear on their watchlist. By marking non-minor edits as minor you are deceiving your fellow editors and avoiding scrutiny. Your block this time is for 24 hours. Please really do what you said you had done last time and read the guideline on what is and isn't a minor edit. Thanks, --John (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again. I notice that since your block expired you have been making non-minor edits and marking them as minor again. Can I be really clear that this is not permitted? I am sorry I may have confused you in one of my messages above. You must not check the minor edits box for any but the most minor formatting changes, or vandalism reverts. If you do choose to continue in this deceptive way, I will have no alternative but to block you. This next block would be indefinite. Please do let me know if you need any more help, by asking here or at my talk page. Please do not continue marking non-minor edits as minor, as I really do not want to block you. --John (talk) 15:00, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Last time; this is not a minor edit. I know you know how to switch the tag on and off. The next time I see you do this, you will be blocked. --John (talk) 15:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Per the warnings above I have now blocked this account indefinitely. Marking non-minor edits as minor is quite a silly thing to get blocked for, but there is a basic expectation of competence and communication in editing here. If you are not able to meet it or make efforts to meet it, you are not welcome to edit here. As before, if at any point you want to try again and think you can follow the rules of editing here, you are welcome to post an unblock request here. You would just post {{unblock|your reason here}}, and you should read WP:GAB first. As you have already been round this cycle once before and failed to keep your undertaking, you should be especially clear that the onus is on you to persuade an administrator that you have actually learned this time. --John (talk) 16:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- @John: user Jbow12 (talk · contribs) created their account at 16:41, 13 mins after Jb423 had been blocked. Jbow12 has added a user review (which Jb423 has done previously to other articles) to Rough Mix (an article which Jb423 has previously edited). Would this be a case of sock puppetry? Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 16:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Jb423 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm willing to follow the minor edits rules and I don't want Yeepsi to remove this again.
Decline reason:
Declined due to persistent block evasion. Yunshui 雲水 13:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mia mala (my bad) that I removed it, but you shouldn't use other accounts (in this case User:Theoddsodd) to remove peoples comments (like you did with mine until I reverted you). Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 13:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/My Size (Song) by John Entwistle, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
File:White City The Music Movie.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:White City The Music Movie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Partingshouldbepainless.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Partingshouldbepainless.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crazy Like A Fox (Song), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:I'm the Face.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:I'm the Face.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Keep on Working
[edit]
The article Keep on Working has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 17:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:La-La-La Lies.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:La-La-La Lies.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Who Postcard.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:The Who Postcard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:La-La-La Lies.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:La-La-La Lies.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Walking in My Sleep.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Walking in My Sleep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
