User talk:Jazzix

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

BATTLERS, CYBERBULLIES AND JUST PLAIN RUDE PEOPLE ARE NOT WELCOME TO POST HERE.

Hello, Jazzix, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 00:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Velvet antler shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Admin Jtydog and User Ronz continues to misquote source on Velvet Antler page. For the removal of this source and blatant misquote I have received this warning.

A review published in 2012 summarized results from seven clinical trials, including three that assessed sports performance (Syrotuik, Sleivert, Broeder). "Claims that velvet antler supplements have beneficial effects for any human condition are not currently supported by sound clinical data from human trials."^[1]

Proper quotation is actually - "Claims made for velvet antler supplements do not appear to be based upon rigorous research from human trials, although for osteoarthritis the findings may have some promise."

Obvious misquote.

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jytdog (talk) 00:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 01:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Jtydog and User Ronz continues to misquote source on Velvet Antler page. For the removal of this source and blatant misquote I have received this warning.

A review published in 2012 summarized results from seven clinical trials, including three that assessed sports performance (Syrotuik, Sleivert, Broeder). "Claims that velvet antler supplements have beneficial effects for any human condition are not currently supported by sound clinical data from human trials."^[2]

Proper quotation is actually - "Claims made for velvet antler supplements do not appear to be based upon rigorous research from human trials, although for osteoarthritis the findings may have some promise."

Edit warring at Velvet antler

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Velvet antler. Returning from an edit-warring block to re-start your edit warring is probably not a good idea. Roxy the dog. bark 17:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ Gilbey A, Perezgonzalez JD (2012). "Health benefits of deer and elk velvet antler supplements: a systematic review of randomised controlled studies". N. Z. Med. J. 125 (1367): 80–6. PMID 23321886.
^ Gilbey A, Perezgonzalez JD (2012). "Health benefits of deer and elk velvet antler supplements: a systematic review of randomised controlled studies". N. Z. Med. J. 125 (1367): 80–6. PMID 23321886.

[1] Gilbey A, Perezgonzalez JD (2012). "Health benefits of deer and elk velvet antler supplements: a systematic review of randomised controlled studies". N. Z. Med. J. 125 (1367): 80–6. PMID 23321886.

[2] Gilbey A, Perezgonzalez JD (2012). "Health benefits of deer and elk velvet antler supplements: a systematic review of randomised controlled studies". N. Z. Med. J. 125 (1367): 80–6. PMID 23321886.

[1]

[2]