User talk:Jayverma2210

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Pankaj Joshi (physicist), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 23:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your submission! I'm going to be declining this draft for now as it really isn't structured in a manner that's appropriate for an encyclopedia. For example, § Why Moon? reads entirely like an attempt at persuading the reader that the Moon would be an interesting subject to study (and is also unsupported by references), which doesn't have a place in an encyclopedic article. Also phrases such as "surpassing the limits of future..." border on "peacock" language, which exists simply to make the subject appear more appealing without imparting any useful information. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayverma2210! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have read through the Lunar GW article, I like it. Excellent technical content. But, as you can see, Wikipedia has certain strict style guidelines. What you wrote would be ideal for a magazine like Physics Today or similar; but for WP, the style is wrong. I like the article, you really should fix it up and get it out of the draft stage. The links above will explain how to get help with the needed changes. Anyway, I also left a few questions on the article talk page. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Naked singularity

Hi!

Thank you for your edits to naked singularity! They are fine, with some minor quibbles, which I'd like to explain. Before I start, I'd like to mention that I'm the person who made a complete hash of things, and then, realizing my mistake, tried to restore things back into what I thought was a workable order. My apologies for that, it was a late-night whoopsie. I was tired, and I erred.

Here's the problem: Wikipedia articles are meant to have a lede written in a certain, particular style. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section for the gory details. While reading this article (late at night) I noticed that the lede was not in the conventional format. Further down, I read something else that did not seem quite right (it was late at night) and I got suspicious: this had all the hallmarks of a crank editor inserting what is widely feared: "original research". Looking at the edit history, I saw your changes, and decided to revert all of them, fearing that they were all cranky.

Minutes later, I realized I'd made a mistake. I re-read what you'd written, and it all seemed to be just fine, so I undid all of my deletions. There remained the problem of the lede, which did not follow the manual of style. So I resurrected the old lede, and merged your alterations so that they'd still follow the formal style. I believe that what I left behind was the best of both worlds: technically correct, and in the proper style.

Today, I notice that you've undone this, breaking the style once again. I'll revert. Please read and double-check, but stick to the proper style. I think that the result is technically correct, but its possible I'd made a mistake (why, it's late at night, even right now!). Again sorry for the inconvenience, thank you for the contributions, and ummm, welcome to Wikipedia, even if it feels like a rough start. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection

Hello, Jayverma2210. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lunar Gravitational Wave Detection".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]