User talk:Jayteecork

Watch what you edit. You erased the article for the relatively notable baseball player Vernon Wells. I've created a disambiguity page.

And welcome aboard. - Matty j 00:21, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

Nut hand

You added a claim to the nut hand article about the origination of the phrase. Do you have a reference or citation for your addition? Neilc 03:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok -- thanks. I'm happy with it as-is, but I'll look around for a more authoritative source or reference. Neilc 04:12, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neilc

ddff. Testing. Still don't know how to respond.

Image:Kpowerpip23.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Kpowerpip23.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-Splash 03:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Powerwiki.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Powerwiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-Splash 03:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodsport

This is an answer to your posting on my Talk Page: Please try to learn a little about how Wikipedia works, for instance how to read the "Page history": I did not write the Synopsis for Bloodsport (film), I simply added the header and the spoiler warning. Please shut your mouth and don't insult people when you don't know what you are talking about. olivier 07:13, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodsport edits

Hey Jayteecork. Wikipedia can't use text that's cut-and-pasted from copyrighted sources, like the text from the Bloodsport DVD. I reverted to an older version that was written by wikipedia users. Feel free to improve it, and introduce facts from the DVD material (etc.) but don't use copyrighted text without permission! — brighterorange (talk) 18:20, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Verno69.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Verno69.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Michael 07:16, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vernon wells2.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Vernon wells2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Vernonmax.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Vernonmax.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Mitsubishi:

On Mitsus, well, what can I say, it's not really a very big deal for a multibillion dollar international corporation, is it? Articles should be balanced and fair, as well as encompass the whole of the subject rather than focus on some small elements and ignore other issues. For example, should an article on Ireland have information about the IRA? Sure. But then the IRA information should be in its own page.

In any case, I'll let you play with the mitsubishi drug issue. I just tried to make it more readable. Welcome aboard. Christopher Mahan 16:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Gold

My edit: [1]. I don't know anything about beer (I don't even drink it), but I do know about disambiguation.

I also moved the edit history for Dutch gold to Dutch Gold.

Also, I think you cut and paste Dutch gold to Dutch Gold. You never have to use cut and paste on Wikipedia, you can move the page. If you are not sure how, just ask.--Commander Keane 14:24, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Gold guy here. What are your plans for expansion? --Is fior sin

Well first of all, you need to get a proper username Is fior sin, that's a dead link. As for the plans, I think between us we have created a lovely Dutch Gold page, and I'd like to do the same for Bavaria Lager, Amsterdam, Prasvsky etc. You on?

Image Tagging Image:Jamdutch039.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamdutch039.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Agnte 14:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Box-l-jp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Box-l-jp.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 06:09, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Please do not vandalise other editor's user pages - Ali-oops ^✍ 08:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Des Clarke

Jayteecork wrote:

Hi, that's for the spelling change on the Des Clarke, what I'd like to know is, how did you notice it? think it was acheivment(is that correct?!)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jayteecork (talk • contribs) .

Apologies for not replying sooner, my mind was elsewhere. Misspellings in Wikipedia articles can be easily found by searching, either using the Wikipedia search or using Google, which is generally faster. Onece you've identified an article, you can use your browser's built-in Find function (CTRL+F in Internet Explorer) to locate the error. Hence it is not necessary to read through the whole article. I am currently engaged in correcting a wide range of misspellings, listed at User:Gurch/Spelling; this happens to be one of them.

One other thing - make sure you sign your comments on talk pages, by typing four tildes (like this: ~~~~) – Gurch 09:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland national rugby union team

There's no list of players by caps because dynamic lists create problems with maintenance. Put simply because a lot more international rugby is played these days most of Ireland's most capped players are still playing, which means that if I posted a correct list it would be wrong by the weekend.

Other articles might have lists of caps, number of tries etc but they are almost certainly all wrong. Somebody will have posted a list in the past and in the meantime nobody has updated it. I think the correct wiki protocol is to try to find a website that updates itself and then link to it but I haven't found any.GordyB 10:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Gold

Well, Oranjeboom manufactured the beer at some time, that's for sure, but since the brewery was closed recently I don't know where it is made now. Possibly a big InBev plant in Leuven or Jupille (both Belgium), but it could also be the Dommelsch brewery , the only InBev brewery left in the Netherlands. One reference in English may be http://www.ratebeer.com/beer/melchers-dutch-gold-lager/37167/, although I’m not 100% sure it’s the same beer. Dutch Gold however IS mentioned as an InBev brand in Interbrew/InBev’s (Oranjeboom's owner) year reports of 2003 and 2004. The article, before I edited, mentioned a brewery in Breda. Since a brewery in Breda would never be named Zuidhollandse Bierbrouwerij (Breda is not in Holland) and the only brewery in Breda (until recently, of course) was Oranjeboom, that just had to be the actual brewery. It is a complex matter actually. The original brewer obviously was Zuidhollandse Bierbrouwerij in The Hague, which closed in 1974 but continued to exist in name. Its beers were then first made at Oranjeboom in Rotterdam and, when that one closed, later at Oranjeboom in Breda, until 1973 known as De Drie Hoefijzers. Many old breweries of the Netherlands exist in name only, Especially Heineken has a long tradition of fooling the public that way. Fnorp 07:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Samples 108.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Samples 108.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 02:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tyrrellwiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tyrrellwiki.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 06:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response, but please release copyright information to the image. e.g. {{GFDL-self}}, {{PD-self}}, else use the most suitable tag from the list. If you have uploaded some other images which are not tagged propely, please do so. If there is some problem to tag the image, please let me know. Shyam ^(T/C) 15:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Hi, you recently made a comment about a certain author on a certain talk page. Because I was concerned about something, I removed it for now, but please see this. Thanks. Edwy ^(talk) 13:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image:Samples 041 (2).jpg

Hello Jayteecork. Wikipedia requires that all uploads be marked with a license. Since you are the creator or Image:Samples 041 (2).jpg, please add an appropriate tag, or the image will be deleted in a week. ~MDD 46 96 22:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Desclarke.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Desclarke.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Samples 108.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Samples 108.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Sherool (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned public domain images

The following images were uploaded by you, but are currently not in use. They have been tagged as public domain (PD), either as PD-self or other PD claim. These unused PD images may be subject to deletion as orphans. You may wish to add them to an article, tag them for copying to WP commons {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} or if they are no longer needed, they can be tagged for deletion by you as {{db-author}}. If you have any questions, please leave me a note on my talk page. --Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 00:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikijt.jpg

Dutch Gold manufacturer's description

I presumed someone had made up this description as a joke so I replaced it with the distributor's description. Tell you what, I'll pick up a can tomorrow to have with my lunch and have a look at what it says. The question is: does a can of beer constitute a primary or a secondary source? (WP:RS) Curtains99 22:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have a can in front of me, well half a can anyway. It does indeed carry the description I removed so I have put it back into the article. My apologies. I see that you are the original article creator. Well it's looking pretty good after a year. Also I found out who makes it: InBev, a huge Belgian brewery. Dutch Gold is one of their trade marks as listed on p55 of their 2005 annual report here: [2]. "Zuidhollandse Bierbrouwerij" is a trading name of this company as you can confirm from the Dutch companies' register here: [3] Curtains99 15:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guessed it was local to the Irish market because the distributor says "developed specifically to suit Irish consumers tastes" but it does seem to be sold elsewhere. There are comments from beer rating sites from users in the USA and Jersey. I've removed that sentence. Curtains99 01:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikijt.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wikijt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Desclarke1.jpg

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Desclarke1.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 21:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Commando6.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Commando6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Box-l-jp.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Box-l-jp.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Ducth6Wiki.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ducth6Wiki.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Ducth6Wiki.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. JaGa^talk 02:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ducth6Wiki.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ducth6Wiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kevin (talk) 10:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jayteecork! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Desmond Clarke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sampledutchg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sampledutchg.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samples 137.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samples 137.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sampledutchg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sampledutchg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Samples 041 (2).jpg

The file File:Samples 041 (2).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal photo

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]