User talk:Jaymes2

January 2008

Your recent edit to George P. Lee (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 14:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Global warming for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. Brusegadi (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add uncited original research to articles or Talk pages. thanks. bikeable (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Brusegadi (talk) 01:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Global warming

Re [1]. Sorry, but this is a waste of time. Apart from all the other obvious problems, the meteorite stream hasn't speeded up recently William M. Connolley (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Silly, it does not have to speed up. The earth accumulates. Think, that is what you are supposed to do. This is obviously far beyond your ken.

Wikipedia standards of conduct

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Wikipedia has standards on civility which you have repeatedly breached by dismissing the intelligence of other editors, for example in your remarks above and here.[2] Comment on content, not on contributors. Continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Raymond Arritt (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Global warming for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. MastCell ^Talk 00:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

You have added the same content to Talk:Global warming again. The reason people keep removing it is that, due to the content policy on Wikipedia, things need to be Verifiable in order to be included in the encyclopedia. Essentially, this means that someone needs to have published something. If you have a source in a peer-reviewed journal, or if you get your ideas published in a peer reviewed journal, then the information is worth discussing on the talk page to see how to add the ideas into the article (or figure out which article to add them to). However, as it is, your ideas are not verifiable in the cite-sources sort of way required on Wikipedia, and they can't go into the article, so discussing them on the article's talk page is against the talk page policies mentioned above. Wikipedia is not a place to convince people of things; it's a place to compile existing knowledge. - Enuja (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Chickens!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaymes2 (talk • contribs) 16:40, January 26, 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Brusegadi (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Jaymes2, please stop disrupting the global warming talk page, or you may be blocked. ~ UBeR (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Jaymes2. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Satori Son 19:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

You're blocked for 24 hours for repeated insertion of tripe. If you come back and repeat this after your block, you'll be blocked for longer. You can still edit your own talk page. If you really want to discuss this, please do so on this page William M. Connolley (talk) 14:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi again Jaymes2. I noticed that in your most recent posts (that you were rightly blocked for), you've included sources. That's a good move forward, but keep in mind that the need for verifiability in this encyclopedia means that you can't use facts from published sources to synthesize your own ideas. You are certainly welcome to edit constructively when your block expires, and I suggest that you look at the Welcome page and the Five Pillars to get more of an idea of what Wikipedia is about. - Enuja (talk) 20:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)