User talk:Jayfrankauthor

This is Jayfrankauthor's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Jayfrankauthor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 18:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rent My Vacation Home USA (October 1)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rent My Vacation Home USA.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 16:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Rent My Vacation Home USA was accepted

Rent My Vacation Home USA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson (talk!) 14:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Airbnb may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

hq-in-dublin-1.1526454|publisher=The Irish Times|accessdate=13 September 2013|date=13 Sep 2013}</ref>|
* [[[http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Rent_My_Vacation_Home_USA|Rent My Vacation Home USA]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rent My Vacation Home USA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rent My Vacation Home USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rent My Vacation Home USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some topics that are almost always accepted

Topics that almost always meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines include incorporated cities, counties, and larger layers of government meet the notability guidelines. School districts that are independent of cities and counties also typically qualify.

They don't qualify because they are cities, counties, etc. but because they get significant coverage from reliable sources. Now, the reality is that they get significant coverage from reliable sources because they do what cities, counties, states, etc. do.

Likewise, almost all "general" high schools that have a 12th grade will do things that generate significant coverage from reliable sources, but some may not. Specialized schools, particularly those with a "low profile" in the press such as those without sports teams, usually will not generate enough significant (i.e. non-routine) coverage to qualify. Schools that do not have a 12th grade (i.e. junior high schools and elementary schools) rarely qualify - while they almost always get "local press" that is considered "routine coverage" by most Wikipedia editors, so it's best not to try to write an article about such a school unless there is something exceptional about it that gets significant, usually non-local, coverage.

Most specialized taxing districts (e.g. fire protection districts, hospital districts, etc.) will not meet this requirement even if they are larger than a city.

There are many equivalents to US counties and cities in other countries without articles.

Other topics that generally qualify for articles:

Olympic athletes, prize-winners of major prizes like the Oscars or Tony Awards, the Nobel Prizes, etc., heads of state or heads of countries, members of national-level parliaments, congresses, and the like, holders of high-ranking titles of nobility (this varies, but anyone granted a rank roughly equivalent to a Duke in the United Kingdom likely qualifies, as do many who were born into nobility), high-ranking religious leaders (head of a major church, as well as most Cardinals and Archbishops in the Roman Catholic church), nation-states past and present, hurricanes and typhoons, and many other topics. There are major gaps in most of these areas if you go back in history.

If you want to work on animal species that do not have the significant press coverage needed to have a stand-alone article in Wikipedia, try Wikispecies. Wikipedia will generally accept articles on any species with at least two species even if there is little or no press other than that of the discoverer, provided that the genus has been generally accepted by the academic community, but Wikispecies is really the place you want to be if you are working on species that are not "commonly known" to laypeople. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topics that draw scrutiny

Any topic that someone - even someone other than the contributor - might want to insert into Wikipedia to meet their own agenda (typically advertisement/promotion or pushing an ideology - Wikipedia articles tend to rank high in search-engine searches) tends to draw extra scrutiny. This includes articles about living people, existing companies, existing organizations, current topics of scientific research, and politically-charged topics.

Generally, if an article on one of these topics clearly shows that the topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines by a clear margin (i.e. it's neither "barely notable" nor does it rely on a weak premise of notability), it steers clear of sources which anyone might have an issue with (typically biased sources), and it is clearly not biased, it will be left alone or improved upon. Otherwise it may draw heavy scrutiny and be proposed for deletion or nominated for deletion at WP:Articles for deletion.

The list above is NOT meant to be exhaustive, they are just a few areas where you may run into "pushback" if your topic isn't clearly notable, your article isn't sourced almost entirely with acceptable sources, and the article doesn't use these acceptable sources to clearly show that the article's subject is clearly notable. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what to think

Either you had the very bad misfortune of editing in a manner very similar to those who try to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes, or you are such a person and are doing a passable job at convincing me you are not. So, either I owe you an apology or you owe everyone one. I'll assume the former and apologize here and now for anything that I said or implied against you personally and against your classmates, professor, and university both personally and as a group. I stand behind what I said regarding the article though - even if Jimbo Wales (the co-founder of Wikipedia, Jimbo Wales (talk · contribs)) had written that exact text, my opinion of it would have been the same (well, that, and I would wonder if he had received a bump on the head and forgotten everything he knew about how to edit Wikipedia ).

I have a suggestion for your professor: Before the next term, he should read Wikipedia:School and university projects. Wikipedia has an entire group of people who specialize in helping professors and teachers use Wikipedia in the classroom. They also have specialized tools and user-rights to make it easy for professors and teachers to manage class projects. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Stalwart111 12:39, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

was adding books to the article

I added 2 books with references and when I did you deleted the listing why please explain why you delete after the books were added.

Do you work for a competitor and why would anyone delete the article when adding books to it.

Did we add the wrong book

Perpetual Income: How-to Generate Cash Flow from Low-End House Investments by Bryan Wittenmyer (Jul 1, 1999)Page 32

Rent Reviews and Variable Rents Hardcover – December 1, 1984 by D.N. Clarke(Author) J.E. Adams (Author) PAGE 38

The next article I write will be to the company rent my vacation home and let them handle this.

What reason do you have to delete when we are working on references. At this point please terminate me form my membership if this is not put back on the site. I will also never forget what was done here for the rest of my life and I worked for free. Just delete me as I suspect this is corruption on a good day.

I will also recommended everyone in our class cancel the membership and never help again. goodbye forever Jay Frank

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Jayfrankauthor/sandbox (October 13)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jayfrankauthor/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 03:00, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]