User talk:JaySparto

June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mastizaade has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mastizaade was changed by JaySparto (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917125 on 2015-06-24T22:18:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Rajneesh Duggal page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kriti Sanon. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kriti Sanon was changed by JaySparto (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910017 on 2015-06-26T18:40:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Aditi Rao Hydari. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ЖunalForYou ^☎️^📝 15:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Hi there - you've been reported to WP:SPI as the most recent sockpuppet of Improvingthepen. You, the person behind the account, are blocked. Not the specific account, you. Any subsequent accounts you create will continue to be blocked. Especially with some of the rather insulting changes you've made with previous socks. At some point, you need to start talking with an administrator and work towards getting this resolved. You have almost never communicated with other editors that have raised issues (see the issues raised above here!), and that needs to change. Ravensfire (talk) 13:53, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've never made any insulting changes or edits. I was always blocked due to no damn reason. I replied earlier too many times but I don't why I'm blocked always. Even I provided right sources with my edits. None of my recent edits were wrong or objectionable. Regards. Jay Sparto (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the reason for your blocks on your earliest accounts - edit warring and disruptive editing have been common reasons. You've also have some copyright issues noted on previous talk pages. And the idea that this change would be acceptable is ridiculous. You rarely respond to issues that others have raised on your talk page. Wikipedia works on a community consensus model and it depends on people working within that structure. Your style conflicts at times and that causes you problems.

You, the person behind the accounts, are blocked at the moment. You are evading the block by creating multiple sock puppets that will continue to be blocked. You need to change your editing style and realize that you have to work within the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. That means when someone raises a concern or disagrees with your edit, you can't ignore them like you do now. You have to accept that sometimes your preferred layout or a particular edit won't happen. Beats me what you need to do going forward though. At a minimum, you need to stop with the sock puppet accounts. That doesn't help you at all. You need to use your main account and see about getting unblocked, but that's not gonna be simple. I hope you somehow can figure out how to make that happen. Ravensfire (talk) 18:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was repeatedly blocked because of this sockpuppetry! I don't know what even after making edits genuinely and correctly. Repeatedly, I was asked the same questions of which I was tired of answering. I don't know what to do and how to continue and I want to continue because I like being just a fair editor. ThankyouJay Sparto (talk) 23:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry if this is hurting the sentiments. Now what should I do? I'm also tired of making accounts again and again bit still I think there is no space for editors, locally.Jay Sparto (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were originally blocked in January 2015 when you were using your first account, Improvingthepen. You never requested an unblock. Your only hope - and I make zero promises - is to go back to that account and request an unblock. The fact that you have created eight sock accounts since January 2015 is going to weigh heavily against you. At best, you'd have to wait at least six months without socking and then make a credible request to be unblocked, as well as showing some insight into your past misconduct.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]