User talk:Jay12344

Welcome!

Hello, Jay12344, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BarsofGold (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lauren Dixon

The article Lauren Dixon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 21:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauren Dixon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lauren Dixon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SummerPhD (talk) 01:50, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jay12344, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jay12344! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Party Pop (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Party Pop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Hot n Cold, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. 115.164.84.249 (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Party Pop

Hello, Jay12344. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Party Pop".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perpetual draft article

Hi there, I've noticed that one of your draft articles, User:Jay12344/Robot Unison has been regularly updated by your named account as well as a variety of draft articles for over a year, but it doesn't appear to be getting any closer to being finished, i.e. supported by reliable sources and whatnot. While you're allowed to curate articles that you intend in earnest to complete, Wikipedia is not a webhost, and there's no real reason to maintain this article here if you're just using it as a test. If you intend to complete it, please do so quickly, otherwise the article will be deleted. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I see that you're still poking away at this article, but no significant progress has been made to demonstrate notability. It's nothing personal, but if you don't demonstrate the subject's notability per WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO in the next two weeks, I will delete your various drafts. This account has contributed very little to Wikipedia, and as I've mentioned before, Wikipedia isn't a webhosting site. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since no material efforts have been made to establish the article subject's notability, I have deleted User:Jay12344/Robot Unison under speedy deletion criterion U5: "Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host." Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you recreated the article. Please don't do this again, as it will be considered disruptive. Wikipedia is not a web host. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DiamondsintheSky

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as DiamondsintheSky, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Animal (Tony song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animal (Tony song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 23:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]