User talk:Jawswade

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jawswade, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Humayun Akhtar Khan have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Diannaa: There seems to be some copyvio with this BLP (Humayun Akhtar Khan). Can you please check ? --Saqib (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

My opinion is that the webpage http://www.awaztoday.pk:80/profile_Humayun-Akhtar-Khan_249.aspx is a Wikipedia mirror, as we have had some of the overlapping content since 2007, and the other webpage appears to have been created in 2016. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:52, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jawswade. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Humayun Akhtar Khan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 14:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Humayun Akhtar Khan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 08:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Humayun Akhtar Khan. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Saqib (talk) 08:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Humayun Akhtar Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Saqib (talk) 08:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Jawswade_reported_by_User:Saqib_(Result:_). Thank you. --Saqib (talk) 09:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Humayun Akhtar Khan. Saqib (talk) 09:16, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Humayun Akhtar Khan. This includes engaging in edit warring, adding unreferenced or poorly cited content to the article without a reliable source, or adding content that appears to be based off of any kind of original research. Given the discussion that took place regarding this article and your contributions to it (as well as the contributions of other users), it's become clear that the problems expressed have continued to occur despite numerous warnings and opportunities to accept help or mentoring in order to correct the behavior. This cannot continue any more. Your edits and behaviors on this article (as well as in related discussions and talk pages) are expected to comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines at all times. Should any further violations occur, you will be blocked from editing in order to prevent further disruption to the article and editing environment. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)