User talk:Java7837

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Java7837 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if you look at the accounts that nishkid64 claim to be socks, they were simply accounts all created on April 9 in which I was trying to remove uncited categories, they never did anything wrong. For example look at the one edit done by User:Jacobson Phillip, or the other alleged socks like User:Williamson 1957. I have done 10,000+ edits to wikipedia and have created more than 40 articles.

Decline reason:

Technical evidence confirms that you are abusing multiple accounts. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At one time I did I make some socks to effect the result of an AFD, I didn't know we weren't allowed to do such. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joseph3333/Archive but it should be noted that the end result was for Java7837 account to be blocked for 31 hours. I have never done such behavior after that incident. It also seems to odd that me and User:SkyWriter were both blocked at around the same time, since me and him were both advocates of keeping a large amount of material on the, Converts to Judaism article, while none of the supporters of deleting the large section of material were indefed blocked. I think him and me were blocked so as to prevent us from expressing our opinion on the Converts to Judaism, talk page--Java7837 (talk) 21:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come off it Java7837, you were using sockpuppets in AFDs back in June 2007, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claimed Messianic prophecies of Jesus and even tried to hide the evidence when you were found out. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry -- it appears that I did not read this thoroughly. Sock puppetry is a serious matter. I personally have an alternate sign in, but never to engage in the same categories. I have one sign in for historical and textual articles and another for philosophical and religious articles -- and never the twain shall meet. And several admins know both sign ins.

My question is, is there a remedy here? It's been my understanding in the past that an IP can be blocked from creating new accounts. Was I mistaken about that? And is Java permanently blocked? SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quite likely; and his edit-warring with two accounts (i.e., User:TazSmith) at List of converts to Judaism would be sufficient for such a ban, especially since he's done exactly the same thing previously and been blocked for it. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked.

This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the account's owner has abusively used multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Prophets in Mandaeism

Category:Prophets in Mandaeism, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Islamic view of Daniel

The article Islamic view of Daniel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Daniel plays absolutely no role whatsoever in islam. This article was created by a sockpuppet and banned user. Daniel is certainly not a prophet in Islam. Daniel is not mentioned in the Quran once. He is not mentioned in the sahih hadiths once. He is not even mentioned in any major hadith collections. The so-called hadith quoted is not a hadith, which is why he did not provide any citation. The primary editor of this article admits it seems a hoax [1] and has not objected to a deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Someone65 (talk) 23:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Java7837, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Java7837/userboxing/. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Galician Orthodox rabbis

Category:Galician Orthodox rabbis, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.. IZAK (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Islamic view of Hagar

The article Islamic view of Hagar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article violates Wikipedia:Notability policy. There is nobody named sara in the Quran nor sahih hadths. The main contributors constitute of 1 sockpuppet and 1 editor who is notorious for his disruptive edits. Also he uses bible verses for an article about islam as his main points of reference. There are no secondary nor tertiary references either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Someone65 (talk) 05:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Prophets of Christianity-nt

Template:Prophets of Christianity-nt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 19:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:California communities with Hispanic majority populations

Category:California communities with Hispanic majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:New Mexico communities with Hispanic majority populations

Category:New Mexico communities with Hispanic majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Texas communities with Hispanic majority populations

Category:Texas communities with Hispanic majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Colorado communities with Hispanic majority populations

Category:Colorado communities with Hispanic majority populations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Qur'anic figures

The article List of Qur'anic figures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The list of Qur'anic figures is unnecessary since such a list is already at List of people mentioned by name in the Qur'an. The "possible" correspondences is entirely unsourced original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. St Anselm (talk) 20:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014

Today's motto...

Every day and in every way, we're getting better and better.

Nominate one today!

Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

Nomination of Ahuvah Gray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahuvah Gray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahuvah Gray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 06:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hebrew Bible topics has been nominated for discussion

Category:Hebrew Bible topics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Non-rabbinic Jewish texts has been nominated for discussion

Category:Non-rabbinic Jewish texts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prophets of Islam has been nominated for merging

Category:Prophets of Islam has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Baalei teshuva

The article List of Baalei teshuva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This topic already has its own category and its own page. A list is not needed as the only identifiable feature for inclusion is that the individual joined Orthodox Judaism later in life. Lists of people affiliated with a religion would be difficult to update and provide little value overall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Daniel (biblical figure) has been nominated for merging

Category:Daniel (biblical figure) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russian Orthodox rabbis has been nominated for renaming

Category:Russian Orthodox rabbis has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]