User talk:Jav72
|
INXS collaboration?
[edit]I notice that you've made some recent edits to INXS (and also earlier ones including some over two years ago). I first put a 'To Do' request on the talkpage some months ago regarding the expansion to the Lead section. A few days ago I saw that the article's Lead was still in poor condition (it was expanded a little since but not by much: certainly not enough for an article of this length) and there were a few other problems with the article being assessed at B-class (see criteria and my discussion on its talkpage).
As indicated there, rather than demote the article, I decided to try to beef up the Lead and do other edits to get the article up to genuine B-class (or even GAN?). I am quite willing to collaborate towards this end. I started by adding details to the Lead but another long-time editor Jgm deleted some information relating to high charting Australian singles and albums: I have asked for clarification regarding this deletion. I indicated that the Lead should have these for the casual reader to know that this is the group they are interested in reading about. I would like your opinion on this and would like to reach a consensus of how the Lead should look with both you and Jgm; for comparison check my last edit of Lead with Jgm's edit of Lead. I concede that I tend to become too wordy at times and hence a second or third set of eyes is useful to keep it clear and succinct.
I have made other edits to the article including adding the Early years section and expanding on The Farriss Brothers, their time in Perth, reason for name INXS, early manager Gary Morris and I have supplied quotes and refs. I intending moving through the article and editing it section by section (see its talkpage for more discussion). Your assistance in any and all these endeavours would be appreciated.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with much of what you say, I've made a revised attempt at the second paragraph and placed it at INXS' talkpage where I'm awaiting feedback from Jgm. I'll restrict future discussion on the article to that venue for ease of communication. You're more than welcome to jump in whenever you like. As for consensus, I believe it is possible, despite disparate focuses, to arrive at some level of agreement. More information on notable Australian charting and information can be included in the main article it does not have to be in the Lead.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Jav72. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jav72. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jav72. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)