User talk:Jasperhunt

Welcome!

Hello, Jasperhunt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! TheRetroGuy (talk) 14:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Girls Aloud, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 19:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Let It Be Me (Jason Donovan album)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citing referenfes

Hi. I noticed you trying to add references to articles and thought you might find this helpful. Also check out the above links in the welcome section for more information on how to get started here. Cheers and happy editing. TheRetroGuy (talk) 14:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Miranda Cooper do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The website you've been linking would not be acceptable for use here as a reliable source, because, well, it's just some guy's website. We could use it if he had an established reputation for fact-checking, but he doesn't seem to. A look at this might help. Also, it's not possible to extrapolate from, say #335 in his list to "the 335th most successful", because success can be measured in many ways, and this is just one. For example, you could also measure it by generated revenue by a songwriter over his/her career. --Rodhull andemu 13:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Jackson. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 15:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Noel Gallagher. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JD554 (talk) 08:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody can create their own website and claim to be an expert in a specific field; however, this doesn't make them one. For that website to be considered a reliable source, we would need evidence from third party sources that the website is written by who it is claimed to be written by and that the author actually is an authority on the subject. Without that evidence, the website is simply another self-published source. Besides that fact, the information that somebody is the 52nd most successful songwriter in the UK is hardly a notable achievement. Please can you also sign and date your talk page edits by typing ~~~~. Thanks, --JD554 (talk) 11:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I could just as easily set up a website and claim to be anybody I liked. It doesn't make me so. There is no evidence he is who he claims to be either on that website or any other. It is not a reliable source, please read WP:V, WP:RS and WP:SPS. --JD554 (talk) 06:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to A Hard Day's Night (song). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have previously been advised that this site is not regarded as a reliable source. Please don't add it again. Rodhull andemu 11:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Neil Tennant, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. McGeddon (talk) 17:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jasperhunt for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. McGeddon (talk) 17:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jasperhunt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jasperhunt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jasperhunt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]