User talk:Jasondalesweeet

What is your deal? You told me I could delete the notices you're putting up.

That's it, you and that other bitch Jim, are going to be fired in the next 5 minutes. I reported you both to management for discrimination.

Leave my pages alone because I didn't violate any terms of service.

I have every right to publish articles about my technology.

You guys let Apple, IBM and Microsoft do it all the time but their pages are still up.

It's OK, I have screenshots of the original and all the harassment your end is handing me.

Hi, I'm Wgolf. Jasondalesweeet, thanks for creating UMC Universal Memory Controller!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is written more like an ad then a wiki article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Wgolf (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you trying to do, be a punk?

I'll fry your computer's CPU and kill it instantly to make sure it won't ever work again from all the way from over here next time you bother my page.

February 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with UMC Universal Memory Controller. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to UMC Universal Memory Controller. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You just landed yourself in court for discriminating.

I didn't violate any terms of service because I wasn't advertising any product or service.

These pages are, and they're still up

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Microsoft

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ibm

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Apple

Gee, I wonder why you let them have pages when they promote a product, service and company as a whole. THAT is against your terms of service, so it is evident you are intentionally discriminating.

You're asking for a lawsuit. I'm a bigger company than you are.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to UMC Universal Memory Controller. Jim1138 (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You re discriminating. WGOLF specifically told me in his own writing that I could delete the notice that you're intentionally putting on the pages.

Stop messing with my pages because I didn't violate any of the terms and service like Microsoft, IBM and Apple did.

You let them all have pages advertising their companies and product, what's wrong with me explaining my technology?

That's OK, one day I will own Wikipedia, then I'll throw every single employee there out on the street with nowhere to go because you discriminate against the innocent thinking we're easy pray to be taken advantage of.

Speedy deletion nomination of Qbase

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Qbase, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wgolf (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because... (your reason here) --Jasondalesweeet (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're scared because I told you I was bringing you to court? Good. I'll see you next week to meet in person with my attorney for discriminating against me.

I made technology that surpasses anything no other company has.

You don't want the public to see it for some reason but I have every right to expose my knowledge on technology to the world.

You're both, you and Jim are acting like 12 year old kids with nothing better to do. It's past your bedtime, go to bed little kid.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Your recent editing history at UMC Universal Memory Controller shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you indefinitely for making legal threats and personal attacks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]