User talk:Jaskirann

December 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Underbelly (series), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IFurniture.ae

Hello Jaskirann,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IFurniture.ae for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing

Hello Jaskirann. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jaskirann. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jaskirann|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 17:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jaskirann (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC) I just created a new wikipedia page for Mimi Xu as I am her follower and that is why I gathered the information and created a new Wikipedia page for her. If you feel that I did something wrong which is against Wikipedia policy, do let me know.[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Vukhudo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. SmartSE (talk) 00:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]