User talk:JarrickLow

Hello, JarrickLow, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) 16:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

September 2019

Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kelsey Chow without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 23:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you blanking the Asian names on large numbers of biographies? Please respond promptly or, as you're using no edit summaries, I'm going to have to mass-revert you, because it's unclear why you're doing this. If the names or other data are wrong, please explain why. Sourcing that would explain how to correct any problems would also be helpful. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 23:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Userify

Hi there. I moved the content at Singaporean_name to User:JarrickLow/Singaporean_name as this does not appear to be an article meant for Wikipedia's article space. Perhaps you meant it for the Wikipedia: space, but it needs significantly more polishing before being moved there. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 19:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jarrick, since you're writing guidelines for Wikipedia editors (similar to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)), I've moved your essay to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Singapore). While you are still free to create a mainspace article about Singaporean name, it would need to be an encyclopedic article like the article Chinese name is. Notice how Chinese name includes encyclopedic information while Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) includes guidelines for Wikipedia editors. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

- CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 00:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JarrickLow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The IP Address is shared by many residents. I don't know who Cheenarman is hence I appreciate if you stop the accusations.

Decline reason:

Obvious sockpuppetry. Huon (talk) 01:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Question: I'd like to know why you say the IP is "shared by many residents", and why you think one of these "residents" would be mistaken for you in a checkuser and behavioral investigation? - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 00:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP Address

Because it is the IP address of the entire building? JarrickLow (talk) 01:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JarrickLow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Making accusations is easier than reasoning with logic and having an open mind. I read through the logs of Cheenarman and other than the user's username, I don't see what is wrong.

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. There's an established link between the two accounts and this link is far closer than an IP address. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JarrickLow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know who User:JarrickLow is, but not User:Cheenarman. I suppose making simple accusations is easy. JarrickLow (talk) 12:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time wasting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.