User talk:Jaquelinramos16

Welcome!

Hello, Jaquelinramos16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jaquelinramos16, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This isn't written in the form of an encyclopedic draft article. It appears to be a proposal to write an article. However, it also appears that the author plans to express their own opinions. Wikipedia is not a vehicle to express your own opinions, but to present the views of reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jaquelinramos16/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jaquelinramos16, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Feedback

          Hello Jaquelin, I enjoyed reading your draft and found it to be informative. Your content followed the lead section well and pointed out how spreadability is exemplified in our society today. I made a few minor edits with grammar. You should change the wording around so that others can see your article as more encyclopedic. I wasn't able to view your citations or references because I'm not sure how to. The strengths of your draft were the examples of spreadability amongst teenagers and how it has correlated into the popularity of social  media. Most of the draft seemed to be written in a neutral point of view except for the negative section. The weakness's of your draft again have to do with the wording and phrasing of the statements. The tone of the article seems too conversational. Jalijah Aubry (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

It still isn't entirely clear what the subject of this article is meant to be. Is it about a concept of Spreadability? If so, a lede sentence to that effect would be useful. If so, reliable sources are needed stating that the subject of Spreadability is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jaquelinramos16/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]