User talk:Japee

Welcome to my talk page. I'm John Paul. My name on the internet is Japee.

RMS Titanic

I've just undone a change you made to the RMS Titanic article. For context, I think it's useful to know how many people wer on the ship i.e., not just how many died, or how many the ship _could_ carry. I'd also prefer the "before midnight", as it's more appropriate there - the "precise" time is ship local time anyway, so the "11:40" isn't necessarily here or there. Also, it scans a bit better. Cheers, Lissajous (talk) 12:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for the response. You mention using "2,240" for the total on board, but other references on the page say 2,223. For now, I'm leaving it (busy today) - if you want to chase down the discrepancy, feel free to change it. Lissajous (talk) 10:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That picture IS the Olympic. Quindie —Preceding undated comment added 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Oh no! It's not. Japee

Fair use rationale for File:Goodwinfamily.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Goodwinfamily.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:2nd class aft staircase.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2nd class aft staircase.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lifeboat 1

The article Lifeboat 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary article (with vague title) on a topic already covered at Timeline of the sinking of the RMS Titanic#00:45 - First lifeboat lowered and List of passengers on board RMS Titanic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mariajohanna.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mariajohanna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE: [[

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is d]]eleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name of artist

Japee,

When you add pictures to an article, would you mind having the curiosity to look into the history of the painting or photograph you are adding & the courtesy of naming the author of the work? For instance, you added a young Marie Antoinette to her article with the caption "Young Marie Antoinette" and totally skipped the name of the artist, who happens to be Martin van Meytens. By doing some research, you could have found the reproduction of the painting, the name of the artist & the age of Marie Antoinette at the time the painting was done.

--Frania W. (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oh no. whoever are you I'm sorry :(

--Japee (talk)

Fair use rationale for File:Countessofrothes.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Countessofrothes.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marieantoinette young.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marieantoinette young.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Allison hjc2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Allison hjc2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. multichill (talk) 10:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Lillian Asplund.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lillian Asplund.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ethel Flora Fortune for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethel Flora Fortune is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethel Flora Fortune until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emily Ryerson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Ryerson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Ryerson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 22:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Margaret Devaney for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margaret Devaney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Devaney until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]