User talk:Janweh64/old/Bonin Bough

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Marketing & Advertising

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Janweh64 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Sophia Smith on behalf of Bonin Bough. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Declaration (edit summary).

Conflict of interest

At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance tag

@Smartse: I have declare my COI in the edit summary and on my userpage.

Why has a {{COI}} template been placed on this article when the doc file for the template says: Do not use this tag unless there are significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality as a result of the contributor's involvement. Like the other {{POV}} tags, this tag is not meant to be a badge of shame or to "warn the reader" about the identities of the editors.

Do not use this tag if you can quickly solve the problem, e.g., by removing peacocking and puffery or by reverting the blanking of well-sourced criticism.

Do not use this tag to notify readers that an article appears to be partially or wholly autobiographical. If this is the case, please use the more-specific {{autobiography}} tag. Like the other neutrality-related tags, if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article. If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning. Be careful not to violate the policy against WP:OUTING users who have not publicly self-disclosed their identities on the English Wikipedia.

Where is the discussion? —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 00:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GNG

@SwisterTwister: Please take a second look at this article. Here is a sample of just some of the articles that demonstrate significant coverage by secondary reliable sources. Where I can, I have also included links to their editorial team so you may evaluate their reliability.

The New York Times considered him "of note" a decade ago and since then he has been written about dozens of times. I believe this meets WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 20:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janweh64 Examining the sources above shows them to be announcements, interviews and similar and we would simply consider these as either press releases or casual notices (it's not a case of of its reliability, however, but how it weighs for notability), simply not the significant coverage needed. The NYT claim is good but we would need better focus in that instead. SwisterTwister talk 20:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@SwisterTwister: How can you call this PR Week article a press release: Newsmaker: Bonin Bough, Mondelēz International —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]