User talk:Janicelp

This is Janicelp's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Reif (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not establish biographical notability, which is based on what others have written about the subject.

Fix reference errors.

This draft has inconsistent formatting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patricia Reif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patricia Reif, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Janicelp! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...speedy deletion. I did not want this page deleted, I only wanted to create a new edited page with better references for notability. Also, Wikipedia says that my user page does not exist? I did not want to delete my account either. I am very confused by all this, please help me.

Janice Leah Poss (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you nominated it for deletion if you didn't want it deleted, but I've removed the deletion notice. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The name of my account is red and when I hover over it with my cursor it says my userpage does not exist, what may I have done o cause this?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Should I just create a new account? Janice Leah Poss (talk) 04:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't done anything wrong and there's nothing wrong with your account! The red link just means that you haven't created a user page. Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 04:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

No, you just need to create a user page (one option) or redirect your userpage to your user talk page (this page) if you don't wish to bother saying some things about yourself on your user page.

Some people get very involved in setting up their userpage just so. Try not to spend a lot of time futzing with your userpage until you have more to say.

But if you can't resist, there's a nifty design center available: Wikipedia:User page design center

And welcome to Wikipedia! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Janicelp, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Janicelp, good luck, and have fun. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Reif

Congratulations, Janicelp, on creating your first article. You have put together an interesting biography on someone who obviously deserves to be included in the encyclopedia. After some minor copy editing and adding a few links to other articles, I moved it to the mainspace. I hope this success will encourage you to write more articles about women in religion. If ever you need assistance, please let me know. You might also find it useful to join WikiProject Women in Red. You can do so by clicking on "Join WikiProject" in the box at the top of the page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Esquivel and Elsa Tamez

Today I added the focus project, 1000 Women in Religion Project, to their Wikidata pages. Janice Leah Poss (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Janice[reply]

Julia Esquivel and Elsa Támez

Today I added the focus project, 1000 Women in Religion Project, to their Wikidata pages. Added this info to our project page Janice Leah Poss (talk) 23:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Janice[reply]

AARWR 1000 Women in Religion meetup

Hi RosPost,

I am hoping to edit today.

JaniceJanice Leah Poss (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Boston-Gathering, celebrating Wikipedia’s 22th Birthday

After several years of distancing, I wan to invite you tomorrow (Jan 17th at 6pm) to the Boston-gathering at MIT.

Details can be found at Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wikipedia_22th_Anniversary_Celebration

Hope I can see you tomorrow — Johannes Kalliauer - contrib. 20:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ulrike E. Auga (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.ulrikeauga.com/publikationen.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/159460/Auga_Ulrike_%20Statement_The%20Situation%20of%20Gender%20Studies%20and%20Interference%20with%20Academic%20Freedom%20in%20Hungary%20and%20Other%20Countries_EU%20Parliament%20Brussels.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Ulrike E. Auga may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan, Thank you for your quick reply on this. I was hoping to get this up as it is important for this subject to have an English page.

It has been quite awhile since I have written something for Wikipedia. The learning curve is huge and I see that there are many changes as to how things work--I think for the better.

Today, I worked several hours only to be told that YouTube is on the WikiBlacklist and I had to remove those references as well as the one that got flagged for copyright (I did not know). Can you watch this page for me and let me know if there are any other changes I need to address to get it accepted, please> I most appreciate it.

Jan Janice Leah Poss (talk) 00:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ulrike E. Auga (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Numerous unsourced statements. Please address WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ulrike E. Auga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greenman, Thank you for your commentary. I will work on sourcing, but I want to bring to your attention that this person already has a German Wikipedia page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulrike_Auga

and also a Wikidata entry: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2477207. Would this page not be enough as a reliable source? Also I see that Wikipedia is now requesting tertiary sources whereas they used want secondary ones, how is that possible?

She is also mentioned on this page and I just linked her German Wikipedia page to this page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Queering_Paradigms#Queering_Paradigms_@_CIRQUE_(June_2019)

In addition, I have been editing on Wikipedia in 2015 and began the 1000 Women in Religion project, (now Women in Religion focus group) with my colleagues and my handle is janicelp, why does it say my page does not exist?

I hope this helps you as well so we can get her page up. She is a very accomplished academic and deserves to have a page. Perhaps there are cultural differences between Germany and the USA, but those ought to be taken into consideration.

I look forward to your continued help.

janicelp Janice Leah Poss (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata and de-wikipedia are separate projects with different, and generally looser rules. ping Greenman so he sees the above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, See my latest reply--yeah, I'm getting that de-Wikipedia is much looser (culturally, I have to say, I think because people can't "embellish" their backgrounds as in the USA (i.e. George Santos!!) because the career hoops they have to jump through are much more strict to begin with, especially after WWII!) Thanks again, Greenman, too, for your help!! Janicelp Janice Leah Poss (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Greenman, Yes, I am receiving help from Figureskatingfan. We are part of the Women in Religion Project https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Religion. We are editing Ulrike's page for better notable sources. We've been busy with other projects. If you have time to add sources that you might have to validate her page, we certainly welcome those. Thanks, Janicelp (talk) 17:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Greenman, Yes, I am receiving help from Figureskatingfan. We are both part of the Women In Religion Project on Wikipedia. if you can find some "reliable" sources to helps us get Ulrike's page up in English, this would be a huge help to her and to us. Thanks, Janicelp (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ulrike E. Auga

Hello, Janicelp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ulrike E. Auga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fireflybot, Please do not delete this page, I am getting help from several Women in Religion editors on this. Thanks for reminding me. Janicelp (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)janicelp[reply]