User talk:Janayte

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Janayte. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! meco (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goodfly

Hello Janayte,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Goodfly for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gran Canaria Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Lanzarote Airport, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Janayte. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 20:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lanzarote Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:18, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Janayte. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Janayte. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Easyjet service from MXP to FUE

Hi, I saw that you added back Easyjet service from Malpensa to Fuerteventura, but as seasonal. Do you have any reference stating that such flight is seasonal? ty

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lanzarote Airport. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 21:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Correct information

I put the correct information and you write me that is a poorly words? Is ot you style of say thank you? Janayte (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the information was correct, it was still problematic because you did not cite your sources. If you do not cite your sources, Wikipedia readers do not have any way of directly checking whether the information you write is true. I would be open to unblocking you if you indicate that you understand this, but currently, I do not think you understand why your edits were problematic. Mz7 (talk) 08:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Find it

Well, i can put the correct information, but if you have some question about the information try to looking for on Internet! like everybody. Janayte (talk) 09:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see where you're coming from, but Wikipedia's policy is that the burden lies on the contributor adding information to an article to provide the sources which support it. If you choose not to do this, then you are inconveniencing readers by forcing them to find where you got the information themselves, or worse, you are leaving the reader confused as to where the information came from, which may cause them to doubt what you write. See Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information about this policy. If you cannot agree to this policy, then I'm afraid we cannot let you continue editing here. Mz7 (talk) 09:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]