User talk:Jan Tik
|
Image tagging for Image:TO_Honiball.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:TO_Honiball.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
02/03/2007 - Source info has been supplied - Jan Tik.
- I have added a "no source" tag to this image again, because source information has not been supplied. Who is the photographer? Who holds the copyright? This is the source information we need. No such information appears on the image description page. Please add this information if you know it; otherwise the image will be deleted in a week. —Bkell (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I did not see the source link in your fair-use rationale. Pardon me. —Bkell (talk) 00:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Remember this?, I'd just like to say well done for elaborating the page and doing as you said. That is a vital quality on Wikipedia, and I've seen you've used it other times as well. Again, thanks for doing as you said you would, most new editors (at the time of the creation) don't take any notice. Onnaghar tl ! co 14:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Onnaghar for reporting back. Sometimes it is a lonely process, especially if one does not know if one's efforts are even noticed. I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to do so. Jan Tik 18:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Paul Tournier.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Paul Tournier.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Added tag Jan Tik 08:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Tournier
[edit]I found you through the Paul Tournier article. I was touched to revisit his quotes/thoughts. Wandered through your heroes too & glad i did. Thanks Jantik. Julia Rossi (talk) 09:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Koos du plessis.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Koos du plessis.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anrie (talk) 13:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Verwoerd 3.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Verwoerd 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of David Kramer (singer) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Kramer (singer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kramer (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Square Earth.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orlando-Ferguson-flat-earth-map_edit.jpg should be used instead
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 14:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)