User talk:Jamrahkid

Welcome!

Hello, Jamrahkid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Urban pop culture, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sparthorse (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urban pop culture

The article Urban pop culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not for dictionary definitions.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MVB Records

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MVB Records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Creating attack, nonsense or other inappropriate pages. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamrahkid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Where is the vandalism? What attack? Can someone help me understand whats going on? It seems I'm the one being attacked. Jamrahkid 02:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Perhaps the wrong reason was chosen from the pull-down menu, but this block is legitimate. You created one article that was a completely unsourced essay on topics we already have articles on, and another on a record label that might be notable. Then you got all querulous when they were deleted per the notices you had been given. And you kept doing this after getting warnings to stop. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamrahkid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for responding Daniel. The notice I was given for my article on "Urban pop culture" was that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so I completely changed the reading format of the article . The notice I received for my "MVB Records" article was about unambiguous advertising, so I completely rewrote the article paying close attention to other record label articles on Wikipedia. The only information I kept from the previous article I wrote mentioned current activity of the label. I recently took a survey for Wikipedia and ironically a question asked specifically about this situation; if an article I created was to be deleted, and I was given the reason so I could better rewrite the article, would I be upset? My answer was a whopping no. I like the premiss that Wikipedia stands on, and I would not jeopardize my account by blatantly disregarding Wiki's policies. This has been a horrible experience for me. Thank you for your time. Jamrahkid 17:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

After 12 days you have not responded to the message below. I am declining this request for now, to safe administrators from wasting time coming back to check it. Please feel welcome to post another unblock request when you have responded to the questions below. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:43, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry that you've had a negative experience so far at Wikipedia. I wasn't able to tell clearly by reading this request: have you read the guidelines for creating new articles now? Do you have a clearer understanding of what subjects are useful for new articles, so you won't trip over any other rules in the future? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I too am sorry that you have had such a negative initial experience, and I do hope that you can move forward from it and have a better experience here from now on. I have unblocked other editors who have had a similar bad start, and some of them have gone on to make very useful contributions to Wikipedia, so I am certainly willing to consider doing the same for you. However, I do have one or two concerns, and, to help me decide, perhaps, as well as answering FisherQueen's questions, you can comment on this edit, in which you removed another user's talk page comment. On the face of it, that looks like simply trying to suppress a comment you didn't like, but perhaps you have a better explanation. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]