User talk:Jamk9

Welcome!

Hello, Jamk9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like James M. Kirkpatrick, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "James M. Kirkpatrick"

A page you created, James M. Kirkpatrick, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James M. Kirkpatrick

A tag has been placed on James M. Kirkpatrick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Letsvidz

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Letsvidz

I am in the process of creating the page Letsvidz, please bear with me as I am new at creating pages. I would appreciate it very much, if it is not deleted.

Re: Deletion of Letsvidz

Re your message: When you removed all of the content, the article fell under criteria G7 of the speedy deletion criteria. However, you can recreate the article whenever you are ready. Just recreate the article in the same spot with whatever content you have ready. One thing you can do is create the article within your user space at User:Jamk9/Letsvidz, for example, work on it at your own pace and then move it into main space when you are done. If you create the article in your user space, you shouldn't have to worry about it being deleted while you work on it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jamk9/Letsvidz

{{helpme}} Could someone please visit User:Jamk9/Letsvidz and tell me if it meets the criteria for an article, and if not, please tell me what I can do to fix it. I have already tried to create this article, but it got deleted, so I created it on my user page. I am new to Wikipedia and would very much appreciate this. Thank you for your time, Jamk9 (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to remove the help template, but IMHO 104 vids and 41 accounts is a few hundred thousand short of being notable in any way shape or form. As such, it appears to be more promotional, hoping someon will read an Encyclopedia article and be drawn to it. So, no, not at all meeting criteria for inclusion. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed article does not establish any notability of the subject, nor is the content properly verified. Notability here means being the subject of significant treatment in independent reliable sources; that is, we measure whether a topic should be the subject of an article by whether reliable sources, in the the wider world that are unrelated to the subject, have taken note of the subject by writing about is substantively. Because Wikipedia is a tertiary source, all its information needs to come from such already published sources. I also think it to be probable that you have a conflict of interest in attempting to write this article. If a subject is truly notable some third party will eventually write the article. An involved person should not do so.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Irving Oil Refinery.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Irving Oil Refinery.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:LarryDebGravesBrianRay.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LarryDebGravesBrianRay.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:LarryDebGravesBrianRay.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LarryDebGravesBrianRay.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]