User talk:JamieWoodhouse

Welcome!

Hello, JamieWoodhouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Humanitarian Open Streetmap

Hello JamieWoodhouse,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Humanitarian Open Streetmap for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Mike Christie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alfred the Great have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sentientism (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add further references that show that this subject has been written about in depth by multiple reliable, independent publications.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sentientism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sentientism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamieWoodhouse! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sentientism (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sentientism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sentientism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Craig Davison (talk) 17:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sentientism (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sentientism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sentientism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 03:06, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Marc Bekoff, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Category:Vegans was deleted at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_June_10#Category:Vegans. Please do not add articles to deleted or non-existent catefories BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sentientism has been accepted

Sentientism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable Sentientists"

Having a list of "Notable Sentientists" is fine. However, there needs to be a reliable source that directly states that person is a sentientist, either that you provide or that is already included in that person's article. Citing combinations of vegan/human/vegetarian/athie/-ism is a violation of WP:SYNTH. I hope that helps. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sentientist

Wikipedia policy requires that any category added to an article must be supported by information in the article. The majority of people you added this category to have no mention of "sentientism" in their articles, so I have removed the category. Please do not add it back until there is information cited from third-party WP:reliable sources or direct statements from the subject saying that they are a "sentientist", i.e. an article with "sentientism" in the title by the subject is not sufficient unless they make a positive statement of their views and identify as a sentientist. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have a Conflict of Interest in regard to Sentientism

Hello, JamieWoodhouse. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

As the "leader of the Scientist movement" -- as I just read in an article -- you obviously have a conflict of interest (COI) in regard to any editing which involves sentientism, where it's in articles, or categories, or anywhere else on Wikipedia. You need to read our policies on WP:COI, and you should put a notice of your conflict at the top of your talk page, and on the talk page of any article you are conflicted on. Obviously that includes Sentientism and any of the articles about people you claim are sentientists.

Thanks for the comment. I am not the "leader of the Scientist movement" or the leader of the Sentientism movement. Sentientism is just a worldview (in the same way as humanism, biocentrism or ecocentrism). While there are online community groups around Sentientism there is no organisation, no leadership and no funding or compensation. I think Sentientism is important so I am working to raise awareness of it - so there is a risk of bias. I will always try to ensure any edits I make or propose are neutral and well-sourced. I'm sure many edits to other "worldview" pages are made by people who understand and hold those worldviews - they work to resist bias too. The conflict of interest guideline states that "Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships". On that basis, I do not have a conflict of interest. Any further guidance is welcome. JamieWoodhouse (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was the way you were described in any artifcle. Regardless of the amount of huperbole in the description, it still means that you have a serious COI in regard to the subject matter, and should probably not be editing articles about it on Wikipedia. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corey Lee Wrenn (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional independent references that show significant coverage of the subject (e.g., newspaper/magazine articles about the subject, or reviews of her works) are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Corey Lee Wrenn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Corey Lee Wrenn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 23:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamie; in my view, Wrenn meets WP:AUTHOR, as she "has created ... significant or well-known work ... [that has] been the primary subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews". A Rational Approach to Animal Rights was reviewed in Contemporary Sociology, Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism, and The Journal of Animal Ethics, which are all perfectly respectable academic journals. Perhaps you could incorporate these references, and then Maplesoy could revisit? Josh Milburn (talk) 10:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I just thought of you as I was reading Critical Terms for Animal Studies. I know you've had some people raise puzzles about sourcing for claims that someone is a sentientist; on page 365 of Critical Terms for Animal Studies, Varner explicitly calls himself a sentientist; he names Singer and Sapontzis as sentientists on the next page. (On page 365, he mentions that the term originated in Rodman's "The Liberation of Nature", which I didn't know.) Josh Milburn (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corey Lee Wrenn has been accepted

Corey Lee Wrenn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 20:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Corey Lee Wrenn

Hi Jamie, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Some ideas to improve this article:

Dividing into sections (e.g., education, career)
Talking about what she researches/what her books are about
Replacing primary sources with secondary sources as much as possible

Some general tips for future articles: we discourage the use of external links in the body of the article (I've removed these), and the references should go after the punctuation.

Have a great day!

- MapleSoy (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MapleSoy's suggestions are all very good. I've moved things around a little in the article and it's definitely starting to take shape. Some discussion of her books/research would be a great addition. For example, it may not be too hard to put together a summary of A Rational Approach to Animal Rights based on the reviews. (I own a copy, but haven't gotten around to reading it yet...) Josh Milburn (talk) 17:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Veganism and Vegetarianism WikiProject

Hello JamieWoodhouse:

Thank you for your contributions to veganism – or vegetarianism – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a WikiProject to improve veganism and vegetarianism articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics.

If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Psychologist Guy (talk) 11:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing cow-dog picture (discussion in Speciesism article)

Your opinion is sought here: Talk:Speciesism § Removing cow-dog picture. Rasnaboy (talk) 17:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Rasnaboy. I've added a comment - hope helpful.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sentientists

Hi, I noticed you are interested in adding sentientists. I have read your website and I occasionally listen to your podcast interviews. I am more interested in historical animal welfare or animal rights individuals or philosophers etc. I am not sure if you have heard of Guy Murchie before but you should check out his book The Seven Mysteries of Life (1978), there are some other historical examples of sentientists. Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks so much for the suggestion and for listening in to some of the Sentientism episodes. I'll have a look into Murchie - hadn't come across him before. Most of our "Suspected Celebrity Sentientists" here are modern but we have some interesting historical examples including Henry Salt, the Shelley's and Al-Ma’arri of course: https://sentientism.info/who-are-sentientists/suspected-sentientists. I found Norm Phelp's "Longest Struggle" a great historical overview. I think Steve Cooke the philospher is working on something currently too... JamieWoodhouse (talk) 09:45, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]