User talk:Jamie.D.Mac

Proposed deletion of Base 69

The article Base 69 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

most likely a hoax. the proper name for such a system would be base 7. 69 is suspect for usual reason. external links dont work. of course, im not a professional mathematician, but base 69 would refer to a system using 69 separate single characters for the first 69 numbers.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Base 69

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Base 69, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Uncia (talk) 03:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]