User talk:Jamestrepanier

Welcome

Hello, Jamestrepanier, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Newyorkbrad 02:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review

Please, the long block of information is at Talk:Dennis Stamp. The deletion review already says that it is there. As structured, it is not sutiable for the deletion review page. After first putting it on the wrong day, you have since replaced all the legitimate discussion with this stuff. This was not helpful. I have restored the deletion review discussion that you deleted. If you feel a need to write something stronger than what is already there to say that "hey this stuff is on the article's talk page", feel free to say that. But please don't put this stuff back on the deletion review page. GRBerry 00:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to WrestleMania 23

Do not post rumors and speculation (like Lashley), or spoilers (like Booker). TJ Spyke 21:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't confirm the match, and it isn't considered official either. TJ Spyke 21:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Regarding edits made to WrestleMania 23

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Jamestrepanier! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img\.photobucket\.com/.*\.jpg\b, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 21:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to the talk page of User:TJ Spyke

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RobJ1981 09:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Lashley

Thanks for experimenting with the page Bobby Lashley on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added obviously incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in our encyclopedia must be verifiable. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 16:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 16:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 16:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 16:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since it's clear that you're only here to disrupt Wikipedia, I've blocked you indefinitely. | Mr. Darcy talk 17:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamestrepanier (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1 - Unblock me. I didn't edit anything since the final warning.
2 - Can't I just make any number of usernames from any number of ip addresses and carry on my destructive ways? Jamestrepanier 17:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Even here, it is clear you have no intention of making productive edits. -- Yamla 21:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I made NO edits since my "last warning" - So if I did not violate that warning, then how can I be blocked? Please answer me this. I would like to be unblocked now so that I can proceed in making positive contributions. Jamestrepanier 22:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked because you don't seem to be here to improve the encyclopedia. Here's a sample of unacceptable edits:

February 6th: [1] - wiped out the 2003 Oscar nominees for BP, replaced with a link to Gigli (done via an IP address that was clearly you)
February 19th: [2] - blanked an article and replaced with "He's dead, Jim." after the subject died
February 21st: [3] - posted "Are you stupid or ignorant by choice?" on another user's talk page
February 22nd: [4] - repeatedly removed warnings from your talk page via the same IP address
February 22nd: [5] - added bogus (possibly racist?) nickname to article

Given the personal attacks, the vandalism, and the use of an anonymous sockpuppet, I don't see why you should be permitted to continue editing here. Your unblock request doesn't exactly convince me I'm wrong. You need to demonstrate here that you're going to completely alter the way you work on Wikipedia - how you edit articles and how you deal with other editors - and without using any other or new accounts. Show me some reason I should unblock you. | Mr. Darcy talk 22:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is "Black Lesnar" racist? JimmyTrump79 23:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, a WP:SOCK violation just 31 minutes after my post (see JimmyTrump79). I don't think you'll find much sympathy for future unblock requests if you continue to violate core policies. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:New Star Choice Logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:New Star Choice Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NewBCWLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NewBCWLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]