User talk:Jamestown

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jamestown! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Benjamin Woods Labaree - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Margaret Rule - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elly Dekker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michael S. Robinson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Graydon Henning - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Atle Thowsen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Irving Feldman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Perry Lentz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Harold D. Langley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Little Eden

I have nominated Little Eden, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Eden. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 01:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ellmore Patterson

The article Ellmore Patterson has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited W. Nicholas Knisely Jr., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Episcopal and Moravian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Nice new article at W. Nicholas Knisely Jr.. Bearian (talk) 22:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]