User talk:Jamesfbrown

Re: Subdued commercial interests

Jim, thanks for your message on my talk page. From my understanding of the Wikipedia guidelines for external links, links that merely point to a commercial site without any obvious informational value are discouraged. Whether the other sites on the digital microfluidics article actually hide a commercial interest I do not know. Perhaps it's an issue that you could bring up on the article's talk page, or even on the talk page of the External Links guideline itself, to provoke a general discussion. Regards, ... discospinster _talk 00:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated

Thanks for the nice note, it's always appreciated.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 19:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. When you recently edited Digital polymerase chain reaction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clonal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cytonix (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jamesfbrown/Cytonix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jamesfbrown/Cytonix, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jamesfbrown! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cytonix has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cytonix. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 20:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cytonix (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gorden 2211 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Putting 34 refs on a 2 line wikipedia page is an example of WP:REFBOMB. This does not necessarily establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cytonix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cytonix, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gorden 2211 (talk) 01:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cytonix

Hello, Jamesfbrown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cytonix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cytonix

Hello, Jamesfbrown. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cytonix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]