User talk:JamesRandom

Welcome!

Hello JamesRandom, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. You can also add {{helpme}} to your User Page or your User Talk Page and someone should be along to help you. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

--Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 14:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek novels

Sorry but Star Trek novels aren't considered canon. Even if they are written by Shatner himself. Please see Star_Trek_canon#Non-canon. AlistairMcMillan 16:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

novelisations of episodes? the janeway biography? the elim garak biography? those are canon...........sos imzadi kind of.

but generally i spose they are not. 00:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)jaime9526

Fair use rationale for Image:Eu bg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eu bg.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ease your burden

I notice you're creating a number of Star Wars articles (good for you), but from scratch. It's a lot easier to copy over from Wookieepedia any uncreated articles, and bend one's efforts towards improving their version instead of trying to write or create ex nihilo. It's perfectly alright so long as one links to them (I use the usual Wookieepedia-linking template, {{sww}}) and credits them with something like "the original version of this article came from Wookieepedia". --maru (talk) contribs 15:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I create the articles from scratch only when the search allows me to create an article from them, otherwise i'm not adverse to a bit of editing. James Random 15:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tantive_IV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tantive_IV.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Khaosworks#Raxacoricofallipatorians

So you know, you made a mistake spelling Raxacoricofallapatorians ;) — Nathan ^(talk) 18:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who Glossary of Terms

My honest opinion may not be one you'll like, I'm afraid. Aside from various errors, it's unfortunately redundant, and duplicates a lot of stuff that's already there in the various lists, which are more specific. I don't think it'd survive a vote for deletion and might even be a candidate for speedy deletion. I'm not saying this to put you down, just being straight with you. You might want to get additional opinions from the rest of the Wikiproject on the Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Doctor Who page, but I can pretty much say the general opinion will be the same. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're not quite understanding me. Even if you fill it with obscure facts, you won't get it past deletion because it fails the test of notability. A random collection of trivia won't survive, no matter how you pad it up. On top of that, as I said, it duplicates stuff on other pages, so it'll die because it's redundant. If you ask me, it's probably best that you just ask an admin to delete it now rather than working more on it and going through the trauma of seeing it deleted later. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 16:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bits & bobs.

I've replied to you on my talk page. — Nathan ^(talk) 03:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Berry table

Sure thing. - Slow Graffiti 16:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TZ-THRAWN1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TZ-THRAWN1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic screwdriver

Any number off the top of my head. He uses super Time Lord hearing to hear the frequency changes. He feels the vibrational feedback in the handle. The light from the sonic screwdriver flickers according to what kind of injury it detects. The point is, we don't know. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 11:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Lumic credit on Army of Ghosts

You put in your edit summary:

Don't delete this again! Really, I mean it! radio times.

I've amended the cast list to reflect the Radio Times, and nowhere in there can I find a mention of John Lumic or Roger Lloyd Pack. Have you got a specific reference? —Wh o uk (talk) 18:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I think it would be best to stick with the RT listing unless a better and more complete source emerges before transmission (which is only two days away). Better to have a good source but not be comprehensive than to appear to be comprehensive but potentially be wrong.

Incidentally, Terence may correct me, but from my Beginner's Mandarin I'd say that "Ni hau ma" should be "Nĭ hăo", which is more equivalent to "Hello" ("Nĭ hăo ma?" being "How are you?"). —Wh o uk (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Whouk fixed up the problem on Doctor Who. You can't really change the infobox without editing it and changing everywhere its used, basically all tv programmes. Don't worry too much, there isn't much you can do to break wikipedia by editing that can't be easily fixed, so continue to be bold! Tim! 16:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basically the tetx on the left hand side is set in stone on Template:Infobox Television, and you can't change it on specific articles. I think it will have to stay as it is unfortunately. Tim! 17:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dal1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dal1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dalblack.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalblack.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dalemp.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalemp.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dalmovie2150.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalmovie2150.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dalsup.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalsup.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dalsup2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dalsup2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned messages

I've tagged your message on Talk:Cyberman but I'll leave those on Doomsday for yourself to sort. GraemeLeggett 11:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tantive IV

Hey, I was looking at this article. Good job information-wise. Is there any way that you could help me site some of the material? I don't have the SW technical books. I really think this could be a GA. Thanks b_cubed 16:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phobos (moon)

Can you provide any references for your recent addition to this article? If not I will delete your text under WP:V. Chrislintott 14:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't me that deleted it (although I don't disagree with the action). You can prepare text by creating a sandbox - see the instructions here http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:User_page#How_do_I_create_a_user_subpage.3F Chrislintott 14:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have added the text back. I have deleted the image, as it doesn't meet the requirements of copyright (images of newspapers can only be used to illustrate discussion of the articles they illustrate and must include the name of the source). You do need to give specific references, from a reputable source (and I personally am very sceptical about the book you include in your edit summary) for each statement in the body of the text. Chrislintott 14:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And no, 'ufologie.net' is not a Wikipedia:Reliable source. Do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Michaelbusch 16:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not place attack posts on talk pages. This is considered Wikipedia:Personal Attack and Wikipedia:Vandalism. Michaelbusch 16:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

You have been repeatedly adding images that violate WP:COPYVIO, nonsense to articles, not providing sources, and not signing your talk page posts. Please stop now, as these actions are all considered Wikipedia:Vandalism. Any further such activity would be reason for a block from editing. I also suggest you review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Michaelbusch 16:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who fancruft

Why did you delete the bit about the interference for Sky+ on sonic screwdriver. The information was not unsourced and was correct. There was no reason for your revert. James Random

Context: Doctor Who universe, fancruft.

The material is fancruft. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The novel you name was also not properly cited (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). Michaelbusch 16:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove material from your talk page unless you archive it first. Michaelbusch 16:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Phobos2 ufo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Phobos2 ufo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —An gr 14:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Simm image

It would appear that the image of John Simm as Saxon has been deleted. [1] The reason stated is that it is a duplicate image so the admin who deleted it might be able to point you in the direction of a similar one. WindsorFan 19:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Black NienNunb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Black NienNunb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Davinfelth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Davinfelth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:4 lom.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4 lom.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Black NienNunb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Black NienNunb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Garindan733.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Garindan733.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dellalt

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Dellalt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Talz01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Talz01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sailbarge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sailbarge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kabe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kabe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ree yees.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ree yees.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cybermat2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cybermat2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:1194416856 l.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1194416856 l.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 01:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rassilon

Please read WP:BRD and WP:SIG and WP:CIV. Please also read the discussion on the article talkpage where it has been decided that (due to the lack of clarity surrounding 'Rassilon' and the fact that the episode credits Dalton as 'Lord President' only) we shouldn't credit him as Rassilon ourselves. Thanks. ╟─Treasury Tag►Africa, Asia and the UN─╢ 23:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-- Are you a retard? David Tennant specifically referred to Dalton's Character as Rassilon.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ╟─Treasury Tag►senator─╢ 23:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Movie bg223.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Movie bg223.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:User JamesRandom.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:User JamesRandom.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Doctor Who Glossary of Terms and Names" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Doctor Who Glossary of Terms and Names has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27 § Doctor Who Glossary of Terms and Names until a consensus is reached. BDD (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]