User talk:JamelCad

Welcome!

Hello, JamelCad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 14:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Pbrks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Virtus.pro, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 14:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

XBOCT moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, XBOCT, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 13:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbrks, hello! All the information I brought is naturally written or told in russian language. I mean that all of the sources will be on russian. I have also used ruwiki page to make this one, so I mean that all info previously was moderated on ru wiki. If it is okay, I will use sources (sites and video interviews) on russian. I just wanted to ask if it is suitable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamelCad (talk • contribs)

Hello. Yes, as long as the sources are reliable, and there are sources that are secondary, independent, and contain significant coverage of the subject. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 19:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ilya Korobkin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ilya Korobkin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 13:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XBOCTgoofingdota2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XBOCTgoofingdota2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gameburger studios

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gameburger studios, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 02:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

XBOCT and Ilya Korobkin

Hello. I've moved both of your recently created articles to the draftspace; they can be found at Draft:XBOCT and Draft:Ilya Korobkin. The reason is that both of these articles, in their current state, would most certainly be deleted at WP:AFD. Before moving either draft back to the mainspace, please make sure that they pass the general notability guidelines. The articles need reliable, secondary, independent sources that contain significant coverage of the subjects. If you have any questions, please ask. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 14:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sir. I have deleted all info that could not be confirmed by newsletters or magazines. One more reliable sources are video interviews with them. All the info is 100% truth, that is taken from the team official websites and the person's dialogues with the interviewers. Can you show me which one is not reliable? or which is not enough independent? thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamelCad (talk • contribs)

Having reliable sources is not the only requirement for a subject to meet the general notability guidelines. To demonstrate notablility, we need sources from reliable, secondary, independent sources that contain significant coverage of the subject. For example, in the XBOCT draft, three of the sources come from YouTube (generally unreliable), three come from NAVI (not independent), and one comes from championat.com (very likely unreliable, given no journalist credentials found on the website). The sources present in this draft do not demonstrate notability. Similar issues exist for the Ilya Korobkin draft. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 16:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XBOCT (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears almost entirely primary sourced. Does not satisfy the secondary source requirement for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XBOCT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:XBOCT, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BMM Testlabs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, BMM Testlabs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMM Testlabs (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BMM Testlabs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BMM Testlabs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamelCad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RPSkokie (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ilya Korobkin

Hello, JamelCad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ilya Korobkin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:XBOCT

Hello, JamelCad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:XBOCT, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BMM Testlabs

Hello, JamelCad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BMM Testlabs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XBOCT

Hello, JamelCad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "XBOCT".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BMM Testlabs

Hello, JamelCad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BMM Testlabs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ilya Korobkin

Hello, JamelCad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ilya Korobkin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]