User talk:Jambajew
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jambajew, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Intercrural sex. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- haminoon (talk) 06:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Intercrural sex, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- haminoon (talk) 06:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
In order to be included in the article, a terrorist attack must be attributed to Islamists by reliable sources. The fact that unnamed individuals suspected that Islamists were involved is not sufficient. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 16:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Islamist terrorist attacks. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
If you ever call me a Muslim troll again, I will report you for making personal attacks, and you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Intercrural sex, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The information you have added to this article twice is clearly false and comes from completely unreliable sources. -- haminoon (talk) 18:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jambajew reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: ). Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bishonen | talk 19:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)