User talk:Jaledel
Nomination of Allen Henson for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allen Henson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Henson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Stop disrupting the AfD please. An uninvolved editor will close the deletion discussion after 7 days (normally), judging the comments from uninvolved editors about the article. Archiving the AfD or otherwise continuing to disrupt the discussion will only result in getting you blocked, which won't help the article one bit. Fram (talk) 12:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Right, but you are trolling and not responding to any of my comments. Please see the two books published... That enough should end this discussion, quit acting like a child that needs to wait for the grown-ups. This is a frivoulous AFD please close it.
WP:ANI
[edit]A discussion at the administrator's noticeboard concerning your edits has started. You are invited to comment there: WP:ANI#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Henson. Fram (talk) 12:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Jaledel, and welcome to Wikipedia. Some of your additions to Nora Lustig and Allen Henson have been removed, as you appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Commitment to Equity Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no evidence foe notability of this small institute
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 07:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)- Since you have evidently been evading your block through the sockpuppet account Jackslash (talk · contribs), I have lengthened this block by another week. Next disruptive thing you do, it will be extended to indefinite. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Commitment to Equity Institute for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commitment to Equity Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commitment to Equity Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pinkbeast (talk) 18:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Xifeng Wu. Zanhe (talk) 21:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Zanhe (talk) 22:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Block
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.