User talk:JadeSnake

Apologies

Sorry about that, I removed the template.

I see you're a newbie. :-) Since no one has done so yet I'll leave a welcome template on your talk page (I'm a member of the Welcoming Committee). With the Dan Stittgen article, I suggest you add sources to establish his verifiability and notability soon or it may be deleted.

Sorry again. Happy editing! -waywardhorizons (talk) 23:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's cool, I added the source btw. JadeSnake (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, JadeSnake, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! waywardhorizons (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SFL 1 (2nd nomination)

Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SFL 1, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SFL 1 (2nd nomination). BigzMMA (talk) 09:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 in UFC events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ken Stone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello

	hey thanks for your aports
	thanks for your contributions but the article ufc 145 has sufered andalism Carlosprime (talk) 06:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) JadeSnake (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ONE Fighting Championship: War of the Lions

The article ONE Fighting Championship: War of the Lions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, I am unable to find any other sources that cover the event in detail other than the sort of routine coverage any sports event gets.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 23:58, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ONE Fighting Championship: War of the Lions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ONE Fighting Championship: War of the Lions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ONE Fighting Championship: War of the Lions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 00:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of current UFC fighters

Just a heads-up. I won't change it because I cannot predict the future, but I would not be at all surprised if Jon Tuck walks out with a US flag on his Tale of the Tape, as Guam is not a sovereign nation, but rather a territory of the United States. I honestly don't know what they'll do with it, but I will watch carefully when he makes his debut. Just thought I'd pass it along so you don't think I'm just randomly vandalizing your work if I change it later.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 16:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA

Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have added myself to the page. JadeSnake (talk) 00:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

resubmitting AFDs

I noticed you resubmitted "no consensus" MMA AFDs soon after they were closed. While I agree with your view that they were not notable, I do think that it goes against the spirit of Wikipedia AFDs to resubmit them that rapidly. Jakejr (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I didnt know it was bad to do that. I personally thought they should have been relisted anyways, they dont pass WP:NMMA. It think not having so many articles of unnotable fighters makes it easier to manage wikipedia. I am all for notable fighters though. JadeSnake (talk) 04:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JonnyBonesJones for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ✍ Mtking ✉ 10:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid you are mistaken.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JadeSnake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I was here before JonnyBonesJones was. I am not a sockpuppet of him. I have been a good peaceful editor here on wikipedia and have been unbiased in my edits. I simply do not understand why I was targeted for this investigation or blocked before I could argue my case, but thats ok, I will do it here. JadeSnake (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser shows that you are not being truthful. Talk page access revoked. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 18:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.