User talk:Jacobfeliciano
Welcome
[edit]
|
Speedy deletion nomination of San Rafael Heliport
[edit]Hello Jacobfeliciano,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged San Rafael Heliport for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. R!j!n (talk) 06:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Kharkiv Airlines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced and no indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of IPhone OS 3
[edit]Hello Jacobfeliciano,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IPhone OS 3 for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Staglit (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Healthbook
[edit]Hello Jacobfeliciano,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Healthbook for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mabalu (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of IPhone 6C
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on IPhone 6C, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cult of Green (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at IPhone 6C, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cult of Green (talk) 04:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Iwatch, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.luluhypermarket.com/GoodLife/is-the-wait-for-iwatch-about-to-end-find-out-zzar140.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Iwatch
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Iwatch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.luluhypermarket.com/GoodLife/is-the-wait-for-iwatch-about-to-end-find-out-zzar140.html#.U_GO-8WSxHU. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cult of Green (talk) 05:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
More copyright problems
[edit]I have just deleted IPhone OS 2 and IPhone OS 3, as they were clear copyright infringements. Also, looking at your editing hsitory, I found that at least two other articles that you created, and that have already been deleted for other reasons, also infringed copyright. In all cases, I found that you had posted text which was word-for-word the same as text in other sources which already existed before you created the Wikipedia articles in question. It is unacceptable to copy material from elsewhere, unless there is proof that the content is either in the public domain or licensed under a free license compatible with Wikipedia's terms of use. I hope you will make sure that you don't copy content from elsewhere again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- JamesBWatson, both of these articles were reinstated by the user with the same copyright violations . Cult of Green (talk) 01:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of IPhone OS 2
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on IPhone OS 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://prezi.com/texxoo3nkhao/ios-operating-system. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cult of Green (talk) 01:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Your contributed article, IPhone OS 3
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, IPhone OS 3. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – History of iOS. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of iOS – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cult of Green (talk) 01:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Iwatch
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Iwatch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cult of Green (talk) 01:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
[edit]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with IPhone OS 2. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Cult of Green (talk) 04:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Your addition to OS X Yosemite has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cult of Green (talk) 04:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. In order for you to stand a reasonable chance of being unblocked, any unblock request will need to persuade an administrator that you understand why you have been blocked, and that in future you will not post content copied from other web pages. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC) 
Jacobfeliciano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand what I was blocked for, and that I will not do it again.
Decline reason:
Per below, this is not a very convincing request. Kinu t/c 08:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am correcting your attempt to post an unblock request. You were supposed to post a copy of the text from the block notice and insert your reason, not edit it inside the block notice. As the blocking administrator, I will not assess your unblock request myself, but will leave it for another administrator, so that you get an independent review. However, my advice is to add an explanation of what you think the reason for your block is. We get a surprisingly large number of editors who say things such as "I understand what I was blocked for", but who then go on to say and do things which show that they actually don't understand what they were blocked for. Because of that, you are much more likely to be unblocked if you can actually show that you do understand, rather than just saying that you understand. Have you looked at the guide to appealing blocks? If you haven't, you may like to. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
[edit]Jacobfeliciano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand what I did, I will not copy content from other pages, and I will not create sock puppet accounts to evade the ban. I Promise, I will not do this again.
Decline reason:
Again, there is no evidence of understanding here, only a claim. Given the prolific nature of your recent sockpuppetry, I would suggest that you are unlikely to be unblocked in the near future. I recommend that you take advantage of Wikiepdia's Standard offer - leave for six months (without coming back under a new account), then request a community review of your block. Given the copyright issues, you might be well-advised in the interim to do some work at another Wikimedia project, such as Wikimedia Commons, to demonstrate that you can be trusted not to continue violating copyright law. Yunshui 雲水 08:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
October 2014
[edit]Jacobfeliciano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I really promise, I will not: 1. Evade the Ban, 2. Post content copied from other web pages, and I will: 1. Try to make very constructive contributions, 2. Paraphrase. I will not choose to evade ban, even if the unblock appeal is declined.
Decline reason:
Your new unblock request is fairly similar to your previous unblock requests. I think under the circumstances a WP:STANDARD OFFER approach could be taken in this case. I suggest that you come back in 6 months and make a fresh unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 08:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Talk page access revoked, following sock puppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2014 (UTC)