User talk:Jackmikula

November 2015

Hello, I'm Alansohn. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Hunterdon County, New Jersey, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Whether it's Hunterdon County, Bucks County or Doylestown, the links appear primarily intended to promote the sites, and don't add information about the places. Alansohn (talk) 16:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bucks County, Pennsylvania, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Buckingham Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Serols (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. w^L^{<speak·check>} 16:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015 linkspam warning

Do not continue to add linkspam to Wikipedia articles, as you have done over a series of time spanning many months. Continued insertion of spam links will result in a block or site ban. Thank you. Neutrality^talk 20:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 12:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackmikula (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you have followed any of my links, you'd find they go to legitimate community websites, which such material as business and dining guides, event calendars, and extensive local information. Yes they are supported by advertising, but without that we could not afford the time to perform this public service. Many of our postings include the activities of area non-profits Jackmikula (talk) 16:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"We could not afford the time" - so you linked to dozens of websites you're personally associated with. Yes, that's spam. It's likely a violation of the Terms of Use, too. Huon (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.