User talk:Jackgilligan

Speedy deletion nomination of Wavelength Capital Management

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wavelength Capital Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wavelength Capital Management

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wavelength Capital Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO   A&E⇑ 21:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Article advice

Hello Jack! Note that is it against policy to remove the Big Red Tag from an article that you have created. You're supposed to use the Blue "Contest" button. But that's not why I'm here. I see that you're new and probably are not familiar with all of our guidelines and inclusion standards. In short, for an article, any article, to be allowed it must be "notable", which is a term-of-art used here to mean: "has been written about by several other sources unrelated to the subject". No article is complete on day 1, but if you want to give it a fighting chance, there are two things you can do. First: don't worry about fleshing out the company history and all that. The first thing it needs is to be shown to be "notable" by adding in references to third-party discussions about the company: newspaper, trade magazines, tv news pieces specifically about the company, and so on. Helpful links here are the guideline for inclusion spelled out, and the kind of sources we need to support notability.

The second thing you can do is to start the article as a draft in an area specially made for this purpose. As a draft, the inclusion standards are greatly reduced: as long as it is not a copyright violation (thanks for fixing that), or defames or attacks someone (which this does not), then it can remain in draft state for a long time as long as you keep working on it. An added benefit is that as a draft, you can periodically have it reviewed, and if it does not meet inclusion requirements, the reviewer will let you know what it needs (and still not delete it). In this case, I think that's the better approach. If it takes a couple of days or a couple of months, you can work on it at your leisure. To start this as a draft, click this link and edit as normal: Draft:Wavelength Capital Management

I hope this helps! Crow^Caw 21:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Wavelength Capital Management, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  GILO   A&E⇑ 21:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Wavelength Capital Management, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jackgilligan. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wavelength Capital Management (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wavelength Capital Management and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Jackgilligan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Wavelength Capital Management concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wavelength Capital Management, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)