User talk:JackHearne

Welcome!

Hello JackHearne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HollyAm 17:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Chelwood of Lewes

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Baron Chelwood of Lewes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.147.250.89 19:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Peter Wynne-Thomas

An article that you have been involved in editing, Peter Wynne-Thomas, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Wynne-Thomas. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tova Traesnaes

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tova Traesnaes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tova Traesnaes. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Anthony Rupert (talk) 01:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of John Mann (actor)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is John Mann (actor). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mann (actor). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wilkins family

I have nominated Wilkins family, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilkins family. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of overweight actors in United States cinema

You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston

A tag has been placed on Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston

The article Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. She is related to a famous actor by birth and to a minor peer by marriage, neither of which confers notability on her.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston

I have nominated Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Michig (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello JackHearne! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 12 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Colin Graves - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peter Packham - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peter Trunkfield - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stephen Chalke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alan Burridge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bob Peach - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Helena Michell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vinny Codrington - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jim Alldis, Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ferdi Tayfur - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Charles Wilson (journalist)

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Deaths from motor neurone disease

Category:Deaths from motor neurone disease, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matt Monro Jnr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Monro Jnr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Monro Jnr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 14:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fraternalists

Category:Fraternalists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. MSJapan (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Havers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Philip Havers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BangJan1999 14:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roy Mogg

The article Roy Mogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this person satisfies any notability criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 22:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Seaxe Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Seaxe Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seaxe Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 14:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Durham University cricketers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Durham University cricketers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StickyWicket (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Peter Byrne disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Peter Byrne disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Peter Byrne disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 01:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric Midwinter

The article Eric Midwinter has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arthur Flower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur Flower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Flower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 00:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Don Shelley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Shelley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Shelley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 11:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish cricketers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Jewish cricketers has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow • talk 20:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Macmillan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Macmillan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Macmillan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allan Ivo Steel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allan Ivo Steel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Ivo Steel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hornpipe2 (talk) 17:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]