User talk:JackAtkinson22

Welcome!

Hello, JackAtkinson22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Kazakh names

What you are deleting are not Arabic names, they are Kazakh names. Please stop.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By law, on the page of each country or city, it is customary to leave the name in those languages that are present in the region. You do illegal things by adding names in Arabic. Please, stop.

Please stop immediately and read our policies. There is no "law" you are citing, and the polcies encourage adding Kazakh names.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing, and explain to me your logic. Why are you adding names in the "Arabic" language, and specifically in the "Kazakhstani" cities and regions? Is this some kind of political order? 3 languages are common in Kazakhstan: Kazakh, Russian and English. Therefore, city names can only be in these languages, period. I know better than you about the country in which I live. JackAtkinson22 (talk) 09:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These names are not in Arabic, they are in Kazakh. Kazakh used to have several different scripts: Latin, Cyrillic, and Arabic, they all can be used in the articles. Do not call me a vandal, and read WP:VANDALISM to see that what you are doing is in fact vandalism, otherwise you will be get blocked pretty soon.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say that these are Arabic names, I wrote that these are names in the "Arabic alphabet". In Kazakhstan, it is not used. Stop writing false information, please read our wikipedia rules. JackAtkinson22 (talk) 09:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for teaching me Wikipedia policies. However, you would bneed to read them yourself fierst, starting from WP:MOS. f you continue removing the names, I will block your account for vandalism.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not threaten me. If you are a moderator, then this does not give you the right to ban me for no reason. I did not break anything, unlike you. No need to scare me. I’ve warned you dozens of times, stop giving false information. In the English page, there must be a name for the region in English, Kazakh and Russian. Nobody uses the Arabic alphabet here. I live in this country, and I better know. If you do not believe it, you can come to this country and be convinced of it. JackAtkinson22 (talk) 10:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ypou argument is not policy-based. I have been to Kazakhstan and know what language is used there. It is irrelevant. Read WP:MOSGEO. Yes, I am an administratorm, and I am about to block you for vandalism. This is not a threat, this is a statement of fact.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, since this is not a contradiction to the rules, why not add the name of other countries, cities in Arabic (not arabic name, but in arabic alphabet? Why not add this to your Amsterdam page? Or Holland? This is not against the rules. Of course you do not want this, this is your country. And you can spread false information to foreign countries. You want to ban me for deleting false information, for preventing your vandalism. Ok, this is Wikipedia, everything is possible here. I already complained about you, I think the truth will win. JackAtkinson22 (talk) 10:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you would not stop calling me vandal even after explanations, I had to open a topic at ANI, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#JackAtkinson22 keeps calling me a vandal--Ymblanter (talk) 12:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3 revert rule warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nil Einne (talk) 15:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JackAtkinson22 - I wanted to follow up on what I told you on the ANI thread. This is not about ordinary users having no rights - this is about everyone following the same rules. When content has been in an article for a significant period of time without being challenged, it is deemed to be there by consensus. You are permitted to make a change, but if somebody disagrees, they can revert, and then the status quo ante - version of the page that existed before your change - remains in place until you can come to an agreement by discussing the matter. You removed the Arabic script; Ymblanter objected and reverted you; the onus is now on you to discuss and convince other editors that your change is for the better. You don't do that at ANI - you need to do it on the relevant article's talk page, or potentially you could have a centralised discussion somewhere to get more interested editors involved (e.g. at the relevant Wikiproject's talk page). What you must not do is edit war to force your edits onto the page, or to accuse other editors who disagree with you of vandalism.

To answer your question about Amsterdam directly - yes, if you added an Arabic script version of its name to the article, I would probably revert you. Then the status quo ante (the version of the article before you added it) would persist until you established a consensus on why the article should show the Arabic script. In short - the onus is on the person who wants to change a page to convince their colleagues that their change is an improvement. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 16:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Giant Snowman 12:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MrClog created a discussion about me without warning me about it

Galobtter Ok, you blocked me, and I will not ask for an unlock, because it is useless. All moderators themselves violating the rules vote for my ban. But I have 1 question: This user MrClog created a discussion about me in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents without warning me about it. And by the rules, he must do it. Why is he breaking the rules, and you don’t tell him anything, but they banned me? I want to hear an answer from you, you are an honest administrator, right?

You posted in that subthread 2 days ago; you were aware of it. And it was a subthread of a thread you started. Since you're going to continue trolling on your talk page - even after a clear warning from me two days ago, and a block just now - I'm going to assume this is just the way you interact with everyone, and remove your ability to edit this talk page. Please go find another website. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Floquenbeam Why do you call every word of mine trolling? Do I just need to be silent? I wrote everything correctly, why if I don’t follow the rules, you ban me, and if the moderator, you will not even tell a word to him?

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.

I wasn't the one who removed your talk page access, by the way - just leaving this notice here so you know why you can no longer edit your talk page. --MrClog (talk) 10:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 29702

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

JackAtkinson22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29702 was submitted on 2020-03-28 11:23:04. This review is now closed.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 01:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]