User talk:Jabrwock

Are you the same Jabrwock who's a GP contributer? --Bakkster Man 16:26, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The same. :) Jabrwock 16:43, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanker

You know the anonymous user who blanked out the rebuttal for Thompson's "Pixelante"? He's done it at least twice. I reverted it the last thime he did it.--Vercalos 00:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re. Jack Thompson

Hey Jabrwok! Just wanted to commend you on the edits you're making over at Jack Thompson. You're making huge improvements to an article that was suffering some inherent bias problems. You're doing a lot of work i would be too lazy to do! Keep up the awesomeness! Melander 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) I certainly think the man is a twit, but I also know that an obviously opinionated article won't help people to understand just how much of a twit he is... His actions speak for themselves, and if we can write a better article, people will realise that on their own. Jabrwock 22:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monicasdude

Think we should report Monicasdude to the admin?--Vercalos 07:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, only if he does it again. Maybe he was just flipping through pages under something like "Pages that are too long", and decided to slap a flag on them. It's only vandalism if he does it repeatedly. Jabrwock 14:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So he has to do it to the same article multiple times? He did it to all the Jack Thompson subarticles.--Vercalos 20:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. I did move all the sub-articles at once, so they would have shown up on the "recently moved pages" as a batch. As long as he doesn't do it again, I don't see a need to report him. Jabrwock 22:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I was reverting both. See my post on the talk page, when I initially posted the new version of the article, about the quality of sources expected for it. If they're not as good or better than a decent mainstream newspaper, then they're probably not good enough. --Michael Snow 17:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not restricted to print media. For example, I'm fairly confident that the CNN/Money column appeared only online. But in case of questions, it's up to you to establish why a source is credible and should be included. Forums and blog comments are right out, but niche online media that clearly have an agenda with respect to Thompson also have to be treated with great skepticism. --Michael Snow 17:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "Modest Proposal" thing is currently in the "See Also" section, which is probably as much as it warrants if there's no more mainstream site that picked up on it. Thompson has been doing lots of things for over 15 years, so in order to remain manageable the article needs to have some perspective on what's important, instead of being used as a vehicle to promote certain things as more significant than they really are. Favoring mainstream sources in the basic article about him is one way to accomplish that. --Michael Snow 18:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archive Jack Talk Pages

Can you Archive Jack's article Talk pages again? Some of the conversations from yesterday aren't really needed as they are mostly complaints, and its getting kinda long with us hashing out details on the article. If you can just weed out the dead stuff from yesterday. --Tollwutig 19:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Rcmac collardog wwii.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Rcmac collardog wwii.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rcmac collardog wwii.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rcmac collardog wwii.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:Jack Thompson (attorney)/Research

Talk:Jack Thompson (attorney)/Research, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jack Thompson (attorney)/Research (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Jack Thompson (attorney)/Research during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cadet Services of Canada capbadge.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Cadet Services of Canada capbadge.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CadetInstructorsCadre.png)

Thanks for uploading File:CadetInstructorsCadre.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jabrwock. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jabrwock. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Regiment of Canadian Artillery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Batoche and Cut Knife (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jabrwock. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cadet Instructors Cadre Branch Flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cadet Instructors Cadre Branch Flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cadet Services of Canada capbadge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cadet Services of Canada capbadge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]