User talk:Jaasmeimer Zoosteraatz

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaasmeimer Zoosteraatz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of vandalising when I didnt do anything. For some reason there has been vandalism on this account and I didnt do it. Please expalin what the hell is going on here. Is this a shared I.P or something? --Jaasmeimer Zoosteraatz

Decline reason:

Suspected sockpuppet of User:Molag Bal. 17:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pakankylä, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 15:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I didnt vandalise at all. Show evidence that I vandalised or say sorry. --Jaasmeimer Zoosteraatz 16:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have vandalized Wikipedia. You replaced two pages, Pakankylä and Chafe-wax, with the text "FUCKING JERK!". Here is the proof: [1] and [2]. These diffs clearly show that you have vandalized Wikipedia. Andrew_pmk | Talk 16:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope that wasnt me, now please say sorry NOW. --Jaasmeimer Zoosteraatz 16:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you did vandalize Wikipedia. You are using a registered username, so you can't deny that you did those edits. Andrew_pmk | Talk 16:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don;'t know how you can say you weren't vandalizing. It's obvious you did. Don't do it again. Wizardman 16:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then explain to me how this isn't vandalism. Though if you really want to prove you're not a vandal, make another mainspace edit, and let's see what you do. Wizardman 16:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's sad how you refuse to own up to 2 edits of vandalism. And it was you, you can't prove it wasn't. This isn't worth my time though. Wizardman 16:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your responses don't really make sense anymoe, you've manged to successfully confuse me. Anyway, read up on WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and the other policies you have now broken. Wizardman 16:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]