User talk:J jackson

Africoid

Hey there. Just out of curiosity, is there something about Deeceevoice's contributions to this article that you find misleading? Do you have reason to believe that his edits may be incorrect? johnpseudo 16:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

On review of your contributions, they seem to be disruptive and particularly targeted at two other contributors: Deeceevoice (talk · contribs) and David Shankbone (talk · contribs). The aggressive focus of your edits on other contributors is not acceptable and I have blocked you indefinitely from editing Wikipedia in future. WJBscribe (talk) 00:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J jackson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no grounds for indefinite block

Decline reason:

I disagree. You are silent for almost two years, and on your reappearance you immediately target another editor in an inappropriate manner. The conclusions that you are are running a single-purpose account and have an axe to grind are inescapable. As to the length of your block, I see no evidence that you regret any of your conduct, and therefore I can only conclude that if unblocked at some future time, you would continue in the same vein. Accordingly, I decline your request, although if you wish, you may appeal to Jimbo Wales or the Arbirtation Committee — Rodhull andemu 01:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J jackson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

leaving wikipedia for a while is no grounds for indefinite block

Decline reason:

Certainly. But harassing other editors is absolutely unacceptable no matter how long ago was your previous edit, ten years or a minute ago. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 16:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.