User talk:J Martin81

Welcome!

Hello, J Martin81, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hu 00:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esther Delisle

Just wondering why you removed the section about Gérard Bouchard's letter to le Devoir from Esther Delisle. The date of his letter was supplied and the text is easily found online. John FitzGerald 14:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On looking at the article again I think I see what you were getting at. I restored the section with a few more fact tags and a modification to show that Bouchard's claims about the extent of the inaccuracy in Delisle's work are just claims (as far as i know, no one has confirmed them). Given that the letter is clearly sourced I think it's thoroughly in keeping with Wikipedia policy to keep it in, at least.

I do, though, have a problem with the note about Delisle's not having a Quebec university job. It's not really indicative of anything. On second thought, think I'll go back and take it out. John FitzGerald 15:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. You're right. As you may have guessed, I'm disturbed by the same articles myself, for much the same reason. My history with the Delisle article also affected my decision here. The Bouchard paragraph is the survivor of a long section I introduced to clarify exactly what the dispute was about, and that a lot of it was spurious. Anyway, I'm going to check the article now and if you haven't reverted it, I will. Thanks. John FitzGerald 17:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out Mathieugp and Bearcat have been addressing these issues as well, which I didn't notice until after I'd reverted to your version. They're serious guysm so I reverted back to Mathieugp's last version and will raise the issues with him and Bearcat, or at oleast on the talk page. Since it's becoming clear to me I'm not alert enough at the moment to be dealing with these issues I'm postponing that till later. John FitzGerald 18:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EDelisleBookcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EDelisleBookcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhiteNiggersofAmerica.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WhiteNiggersofAmerica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:YoungTrudeauNemnilivre.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:YoungTrudeauNemnilivre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OctoberCrisis-WTetleyBookcover.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OctoberCrisis-WTetleyBookcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BelmontParkMontrealPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BelmontParkMontrealPoster.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:National Film Board of Canada productions

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello J Martin81! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 87 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Elliott Leyton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WhiteNiggersofAmerica.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WhiteNiggersofAmerica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]