User talk:JX3P

JX3P, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi JX3P! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Digital currency, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleLandas (talk • contribs) 12:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JX3P (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See lower section. Layout is not a good part of me :) JX3P (talk) 09:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In essence you are asking for a Checkuser to "prove your innocence". As stated here, merely making such a request is often counterproductive to being unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to come up with something better. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 09:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With respect Seb, I was much upset about your claim that I am a sockpuppet-- also, please see below. Thanks!

Re Socket Puppet Allegations.

Allegations that I am a sock puppet of User:I'm Not Human are entirely false. Just look at my contributing IP address. Danke!

BTW: Muchos apologies for any misconstruction of my edits to Digital Currency. I understand that some lines were silly, but I did also make beneficial edits e.g. to the 'Scam' section which was hideously biased.

Nomination of Feathercoin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feathercoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feathercoin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [citation needed] 02:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:WSF/Feathercoin

Hello, JX3P. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Feathercoin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 10^Eleventeen 04:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:WSF/Feathercoin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:WSF/Feathercoin, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 21:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]