Jump to content

User talk:JJRage2014

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, JJRage2014, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

July 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Curtis Lepore without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:09, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Be careful, there is a policy of "no legal threats" wp:Blocks will likely occur for making legal threats. See wp:NLT Jim1138 (talk) 04:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Curtis Lepore Edits

[edit]

Re your message: The content is properly sourced giving the full context of the issue. Your chopped edits are not properly sourced. While the choice of headlines is provocative, that is the headline of the source and Wikipedia is not censored. You are welcome to find a different source with a less objectionable headline if and only if it contains the same information as the original source. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]