User talk:JFC62954x33

I used Wikipedia for years, especially 2000 thru 2010. It was great. I am saddened to see what it has become.

If you delete factual text and block factual editors, the entire enterprise has become garbage.

If you are now tyrannical garbage and propaganda, just let me know, I do not want to waste anymore time. I will let everyone I know, to stop using Wikipedia.

June 2022

Hello, I'm Osarius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mike Lee have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Osarius 13:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Lee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 15:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

for a long time. My old name and password no longer functioned.

First attempt was pretty rusty. 2nd attempt on the Mike Lee site was exceedingly constructive and not vandalism, at all. The post I corrected, was vandalism. Theft of Historical fact or context is crime. The USA is a Republic and Skousen was everything I pointed out.

Why would anyone delete that and threaten me? That has never happened before.

for a long time. My old name and password no longer functioned.

First attempt was pretty rusty. 2nd attempt on the Mike Lee site was exceedingly constructive and not vandalism, at all. The post I corrected, was vandalism. Theft of Historical fact or context is crime. The USA is a Republic and Skousen was everything I pointed out.

Why would anyone delete that and threaten me? That has never happened before.

JFC62954x33 (talk) 16:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I repost or do I need to move ahead with a formal complaint?

When I was on Wikipedia before, I experienced no dictatorships.

Has Wikipedia degenerated into propaganda? JFC62954x33 (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FormalDude JFC62954x33 (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BRD, you can start a discussion about your edit and request feedback at Talk:Mike Lee. ––FormalDude talk 17:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will do so.

I read the link. I fail to understand why you deleted my remarks? They are entirely correct, in context and encourage people to look up History and think for themselves. I have been doing that for 40 years, starting back on the "Bulletin Boards".

 JFC62954x33 (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship

First attempt was pretty rusty. 2nd attempt on the Mike Lee site was exceedingly constructive and not vandalism, at all. The post I corrected, was vandalism. Theft of Historical fact or context is crime. The USA is a Republic and Skousen was everything I pointed out.

Why would anyone delete that and threaten me? That has never happened before. JFC62954x33 (talk) 16:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FormalDude JFC62954x33 (talk) 16:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formaldude, Osarius.

You were very quick to delete my very polite, historically correct and correctly referenced edits. The first attempt was poorly executed, I agree.

But, the 2nd was perfectly accurate and cited.

I have not heard from either one of you.

FormalDude JFC62954x33 (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JFC62954x33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had not edited Wikipedia in a long time. My first attempt was incorrectly formatted. The 2nd was fine. Formaldude reverted the 2nd, groundlessly. I was blocked by apparent political activists who could not tolerate factual text being added to misleading dialog that bolsters their political goals. History revision and Intellectual dishonesty is bad for Wikipedia, and the global populations. Those against free speech are never the good guys, in World History. Here are my edits on the Senator Mike Lee page, that clarified some very misleading dialog regarding Skousen, and the USA Republic. I did not delete those remarks, but provided balance to anyone reading them. To encourage doing their own research. "W. Cleon Skousen was an FBI Agent for 16 years, Police Chief, Author and Lecturer. He wrote "The Naked Communist" and many other highly researched works, all available at many public libraries, Amazon and other outlets, for 60 years. https://www.amazon.com/Naked-Communist-Exposing-Communism-Restoring/dp/1545402159" The Wikipedia page, for comparison: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Naked_Communist "The Founder's referred to The USA as a Republic. Many, many references and explanations of this fact can be found in "The Federalist Papers", by Hamilton, Madison and Jay. This work by them explains how the US government works and why. Available everywhere for 220 years. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/fed.asp" The wikipedia page, for comparison: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Federalist_Papers "This page in a nutshell: Understand in full the reasons of your block before requesting an unblock. Put all the relevant information in the unblock request, and only that." I did. "that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:" Clearly I did not violate anything. Blocking historical truth is an evil practice, leading to a multitude of human disasters. All one has to do is look at History. Wikipedia has to be run by responsible adults, or it is fiction. JFC62954x33 (talk) 11:47, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You fundamentally misunderstand freedom of speech. You have none here, see WP:FREESPEECH. See WP:GAB to understand how to craft a plausible unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:07, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not talking about my free speech. I was talking about the people who read Wikipedia.

I already read what you suggested. If you read my appeal, I even included dialog from that page.

Also, I read this. Have you read this? I am not violating these policies. Show me where. Disagreement is not sufficient and block policies were not followed, at all.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]