User talk:JFBridge

Welcome

Dear JFBridge,

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for the contributions you've already made. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. You can sign your name on talk pages by using " ~~~ " for your username and " ~~~~ " for your username and a timestamp.

Welcome is a good place to start.
Wikipedia:Tutorial runs through all the basics.
Wikipedia:How does one edit a page gives editing help.
Wikipedia:Manual of Style gives formatting info.
Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines tell about the principles we operate on. It's important, but don't try to read it all now.
Wikipedia:Help covers a broad range of useful topics.
Wikipedia:Help desk is a place to ask questions.
Wikipedia:Show preview explains how to double-check your edits before saving.

You should also feel free to ask me a question on my talk page. I'll try to answer as soon as I can.

By the way, are you the user responsible for the contributions from the IP address 213.106.147.145? I've noticed some similarilites in the style. If you are, please read the messages left here. Let me know either way.

Best regards, RFBailey 16:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I accidentally created this page in the wrong place (as the User page rather than the User talk page: an inexcusable error) the first time round. Please accept my apologies for that. --RFBailey 21:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Stylistic Note

Hi. I've been looking over some of your recent contributions, and before I say anything else, I want to make sure I point out that they're good contributions. However, its accepted convention to put spaces after punctuation marks like periods, commas, parentheses, etc... when writing something that will be viewed by others. I just thought I'd give you a heads up on that, since I know of at least one other editor who got in a fair amount of trouble for not spacing after punctuation marks.

Hope that helps. Gershwinrb 04:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation

I see you've already been asked politely to use spaces after punctuation. I will ask once more. I appreciate your taking the time to add content on Laurel and Hardy, but if you don't use spaces properly, it falls on someone else (me, in this case) to go in and do it for you. It is not fun. Thanks. D enni ^talk 02:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marginal constituencies in the United Kingdom

JF, Thanks for creating the article "Marginal Constituencies in the United Kingdom". I have fixed the stylistic errors that you made in the article in order to help you in making a good article. I am disappointed that you undid all of my work in re-creating the same article.

Here are the changes that I have made again, and why I have made them to help you understand Wikipedia style better:

For article titles, "Unless the term you wish to create a page for is a proper noun, do not capitalize second and subsequent words." See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(capitalization). This is why I have moved the article from "Marginal Constituencies in the United Kingdom" to "Marginal constituencies in the United Kingdom". the article
For sub-headings within articles, "Capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus 'Rules and regulations', not 'Rules and Regulations'." See WP:MOSHEAD.
"Avoid links within headings. Depending on settings, some users may not see them clearly. It is much better to put the appropriate link in the first sentence under the heading." See WP:MOSHEAD.
I have fixed the following links to direct the reader to the most relevant article:

Please checks these links to see why the links that I have made provide better information to the reader. Conservative is a disambiguation page that provides little information. Labour and General Election are articles about the concepts of "labour" and "general elections", and are not specific to the United Kingdom.

I have also provided an explanation and the beginning of each section to help the reader understand what he or she is reading. Please remember that Wikipedia is an international encyclopaedia, and not all readers will understand British political terminology.

Finally, I am concerned that your undoing of my changes suggest that you may be making the mistake that many new editors make, that of thinking that an article that you create in Wikipedia "belongs" to you, so you alone get to decide how it is formatted and what the content is. This is not the case. Please review WP:OWN.

If you have any questions, you can post on my talk page. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 12:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation again

I see that other editors have politely asked you to be more careful about inserting spaces after punctuation marks, but that you have not responded to these messages and have continued to ignore their requests. By doing so, you are creating unnecessary work for other editors who have to go back over the articles you have revised, and fix the punctuation/spacing. If you continue in doing this, you run the risk that your otherwise valuable contributions may be reverted by impatient editors. --Russ (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Mrld 02:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 20:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jack Rice

A tag has been placed on Jack Rice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —BradV 18:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Adam Tomei

A tag has been placed on Adam Tomei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bongo matic 09:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Adam Tomei

I have nominated Adam Tomei, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Tomei. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongo matic 15:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Haven

A tag has been placed on Alan Haven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Michael Johnson (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Alan Haven

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Alan Haven. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy at Alan Haven

Did not remove speedy deletion deliberately;I edited this out as I was creating page,and thought it was superfluous before I witnessed page creation.Alan Haven is mentioned on the page of former Miss World Lesley Langley,and has been a prolific and active musician since the 1960's.Will leave decision with relevant administrators.Thank You,JF Bridge,23.05 hrs,28/5/09.

Hi there JFridge, don't forget to add {{holdon}} to the article page when contesting speedy deletion, I've done it for you in this case. Cheers - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 22:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello JFBridge! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Anthony Wager - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Suzy Kendall - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul Hilton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will try and do the above soon,JFBridge,9 January 2010 (UTC)

File:DSCF0218.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSCF0218.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Haruth (talk) 15:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would be useful, e.g. to know where the museum was? I have requested a rename to Laurel and Hardy Museum (assuming that is the main item?) but you can change that when you go to edit the description if not the case. (Don't worry - if the rename happens before you get there, will be redirected automatically - but there is such a massive backlog, it is unlikely ;) ) Best wishes --Haruth (talk) 15:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:DSCF0218.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:DSCF0218.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξ ^xplicit 22:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say

Whenever I see your username, I have to smile. That little reading thing in one's brain that fills in gaps in words always serves to make me read your username as JeffBridges. :) Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Riley

Hello, JFBridge. You have new messages at TheRetroGuy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TheRetroGuy (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samantha Power (actress)

The article Samantha Power (actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jokaz1892 (talk) 15:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samantha Power (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samantha Power (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Power (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) ^{T or M}/_{Sign mine} 23:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Elizabeth Russell (actress), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cat People and So Big (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Paul Maxey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Untouchables (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Henry G. Sanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Charles Burnett, Breathless, Knight Rider and Hard Country

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Henry G. Sanders

Hey i added a reference tag to Henry G. Sanders, not sure if you have any sources or not. But if you follow the links on his filmography, you could probably pull some references from their page to cite. good luckMillertime246 (talk) 05:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank Gatliff

The article Frank Gatliff has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frank Gatliff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Britain, The Avengers, The Good Life, Déjà Vu (film) and On The Beach

Graham Jarvis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Misery

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Glen MacWilliams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Untouchables, Wanted: Dead or Alive, Head Over Heels and A-Haunting We Will Go

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James Finlayson (actor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Foreign Correspondent, The Perils of Pauline, Way Out West, To Be or Not to Be, Thicker Than Water and Me and My Pal

Carol Morley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to English

Christopher Nolan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Anglo-American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mischa Barton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating David Leland (actor), JFBridge!

Wikipedia editor TCN7JM just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hey. I have marked David Leland (actor) as patrolled. In the future, though, please add inline citations to represent your references. –TC N7 JM 03:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on TCN7JM's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Leland (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hi, thanks for your work. Just a reminder that on the English WP we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms. Thanks. Tony (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tonia Sotiropoulou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Philliber, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Impostor, Gentle Annie and Double Indemnity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Barbarian and the Geisha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

q=john%20wayne%20john%20huston&f=false John Wayne:American (biography) p.436-437]</ref><ref>[http://www.emanuellevy.com/comment/barbarian-and-the-geisha-john-wayne-on-john-huston-9/ Emanuel

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peggy Dow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shakedown and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Pelling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Pelling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gia Scala

The comment you removed from Gia Scala article came directly from the book: Gia Scala: The First Gia. Therefore, your conclusion that it was factitious is incorrect. Chaos4tu (talk) 14:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Rinder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southgate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JFBridge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ken Parry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Avengers and The Newcomers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JFBridge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eddie Dunn (actor)

The article Eddie Dunn (actor) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eddie Dunn (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eddie Dunn (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Dunn (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JFBridge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Wesley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Wesley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Wesley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eddie Conrad (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jack Frost were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eddie Conrad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eddie Conrad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jack Frost (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JFBridge! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jack Frost (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of most-disliked YouTube videos

Did you search the millions of videos on YouTube today to determine the 50 most disliked? Or did you find an independent reliable source that identifies the 50 most disliked videos today? The video linked in the article provides number of dislikes for that video only, but it has nothing about the number of dislikes on the remaining millions of videos on YouTube. I started a discussion on the talk page previously. I'll pose the same question to you there for a response. If you can't provide a response, consider this a warning for violating WP:V. I can only suggest you stop doing this tinkering as others may report you for such actions. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eddie Conrad

Hello, JFBridge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eddie Conrad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kim & Co. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kim & Co., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kim & Co.

Hello, JFBridge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kim & Co., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Below Zero (1930 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Below Zero (1930 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Below Zero (1930 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 22:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]