User talk:JAMAMBTGE

Welcome!

Hi JAMAMBTGE! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 04:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Princess Alexandra, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 23:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Members of the royal family receive Coronation and Jubilee medals as long as they are alive during their lifetime to the Coronation or Jubilee. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 02:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Arthur LeBlanc, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following link is in black and white, but it can be clearly seen that HRH is wearing a medal. The ribbon is most likely Queen Elizabeth's Coronation Medal because it has multiple colors and is not a singular color like the Royal Family Order Ribbons. I do apologize if I said that HRH had received King Geroge 6th's coronation medal, but she did receive Queen Elizibith's coronation medal, and as a working member of the royal family she has also received every Jubilee and Coronation medal since. This can be proven by looking at HRH The Duke of Kent, who has received all of the Jubilee and Coronation medals.

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/princess-alexandra-of-kent-wearing-the-uniform-and-beret-of-news-photo/3291756 JAMAMBTGE (talk) 05:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That file disproves your theory. It shows her wearing one medal in 1954, which appears to be the 1953 coronation medal. Therefore, your claim that she received the 1937 medal aged 6 months is disproven. If you continue to make things up, you will be blocked. DrKay (talk) 17:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. DrKay (talk) 17:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s fine, I understand, but I have two questions. First, Does everything need to be sourced, because some things are just known? And If I were able to source the mistake I made, would it be kept up? JAMAMBTGE (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is guidance at Wikipedia:Verifiability. Typically, very obvious statements are not cited because no-one seriously challenges that material. Anything challenged should only be restored with a source that directly supports the material. DrKay (talk) 16:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Janet Austin

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Janet Austin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Anita Neville

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anita Neville, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Eva Aariak

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eva Aariak, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Postnominals

Please do not add postnominals to the first sentence of articles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Post-nominals and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography/2023 archive#Proposal: Moving post-nominals from lead sentences to article bodies. Post-nominal letters should not be in the first sentence. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Nick Houghton, you may be blocked from editing. Dormskirk (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will fix the sourcing issue, and any information I put was already on the page JAMAMBTGE (talk) 04:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on William Heseltine

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page William Heseltine, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Luke Montagu, Viscount Hinchingbrooke, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Using external links in the article body. scope_creep^Talk 07:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Luke Montagu, Viscount Hinchingbrooke have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 07:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good, thanks JAMAMBTGE (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JAMAMBTGE! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 23:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I apologize. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 00:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

We usually delete redundant templates. All but one of the links on {{Mountbatten-Windsor}} are repeated on {{Windsor family}}, so it is a prime candidate for deletion. The purpose of navboxes is to link articles together. If they are already linked through another navbox, there is no need to create another. DrKay (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly understand the rules better then I do. I apologize for any mistakes I have made, and if you spot them, please fix them. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 08:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Princess Joséphine-Charlotte of Belgium a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. John B123 (talk) 06:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JAMAMBTGE (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'The Hon'

I have reverted more than one of your edits that appear to show a lack of understanding of when 'the Hon' is used as a pre-nominal style, at least in British-themed areas. Whereas 'the Rt Hon' is rightly applied to Privy Counsellors and/or peers of the rank of earl, viscount and baron, 'the Hon' is for only the younger sons of peers of the rank of earl, and for all children of peers of the rank of viscount and baron. You seem to be under the assumption that all Members of Parliament not entitled to 'the Rt Hon <first name> <last name>' are, therefore, automatically 'the Hon <first name> <last name>'; however, this is wrong. It is possibly compounded by reference in the House of Commons chamber to 'the Honourable Member for <place>', yet this does not extend to their names, unlike 'the Rt Hon'. ZeroAlpha87 (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was under a different impression, but you are the expert. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are people more worthy of the label of 'expert' than I am, but this is a topic with which I am familiar enough to be confident to rest on my laurels. ZeroAlpha87 (talk) 22:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duke of Sussex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montecito. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sortable tables

Please stop adding "sortable" to tables if you are not going to go through and clean the tables up to sortable standards. Sort keys need to be added, either as {{Sortname}} or {{Sort}}, and columns that should not be sortable (such as portraits, pictures of ribbons, or notes and references columns) need to have class="unsortable" added to them.

So far I see Spouse of the prime minister of New Zealand, Pieter van Vollenhoven and List of awards and honours received by Hassanal Bolkiah, but I assume you will know if there are others. — HTGS (talk) 01:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Australian flags

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Australian flags, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 21:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Royal Victorian Order while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, This was not me. While I disagree with the decision to not have any icons on the Royal Victorian Order page, I respect it. I am also currently banned, something I additionally respect. I have looked at the IP address and it is not my location. It was also looked to make sure it was not the IP address I had before creating an Account and it is not. In fact, I live on a completely another side of the world. Also, I looked at the edits made by this account, and while I do think that's how the page should look, I don't like the crown used for the king. Sorry for the confusion. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 07:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your block expired a few hours ago. DrKay (talk) 07:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of that, thank you, but I still would not have edited this page. I have personally given up on any hope of a change on that page. It was not my edits. I have only one account, and I don't enjoy getting blocked. I intend to make edits so as not to get blocked. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 07:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear, thanks. DrKay (talk) 07:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024 - RFK Jr

Hi @JAMAMBTGE

Just a quick one, to please make sure your edits are factual relating to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. page, I just wanted to let you know I have reversed your edit, where you removed "Presumptive" from "Presumptive Nominee" in the info-box, please be aware that he is still the Presumptive Nominee not the Nominee, please only remove Presumptive when there is accurate sourcing that the Formal Nomination by President Elect Trump has been made to the United States Senate, and the confirmation process has formally begun. If you have any questions feel free to ask! Knowledgework69 (talk) 21:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks. I understand my mistake. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 22:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serena Armstrong-Jones, Countess of Snowdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Countess of Snowdon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Lady Susan Hussey

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lady Susan Hussey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please note that Twitter[1] and Youtube[2] are not generally considered Wikipedia:Reliable sources. They are both listed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources as sources to be used with caution, and then only in certain circumstances when the uploader/poster is an acknowledged subject-matter expert or an official account. DrKay (talk) 07:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I source Youtube or Twiter, it is either from an official and/or reliable source and is usually linked to a specific time so that only that screenshot is considered a source. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 08:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. It is obvious that sources such as this[3] are neither official nor reliable sources. You have been warned and blocked multiple times for persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you continue to disrupt wikipedia you will be blocked again, indefinitely. DrKay (talk) 09:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't wish to sound or be rude, but it's a video, clearly of Lady Hussey wearing the order. I have never cited information that an unreliable source has claimed but a photo, and here I am sourcing a video. Here is another Source: https://64.media.tumblr.com/69fe0ed2699e1df4bb2cb07fbdfbc03a/a66dcb6134569188-9c/s1280x1920/2ca7457495fd4c7026dbfcbb6773ed93f5b2bca1.jpg.

Additionally, each time you revert my edit the page glitches, and I fix it. I don't mean to sound rude, but please check after you make an edit, because it does not always end up looking right. I have fixed the page and added the source. I also want to mention the use of YouTube. I know YouTube is not always a reliable source, but I used the person's official YouTube channel as a source, and then also used links from the CNN YouTube channel that was talking about the first YouTube video.

And regarding being blocked multiple times, I have. Most recently, to my understanding, for formatting something in a way unfavorably to others. I have also been accused of making edits that I did not make. Most recently by you. I have one account. I don't edit on any other account or if not logged into my account. I also saw that you blocked an account that does not even belong, claiming it was also mine. The account 'JAE09' is not mine, and I don't know the owner, I just know that it was blocked, and the accusation was that it was also mine. I have never attempted to add unsourced information.

Lastly; this is about I different edit of mine that you reverted and I wanted to ask you about it instead of writing a long shpiel in the comment. Firstly, Grand Duke George Mikhailovich of Russia considers himself to be a member of the House of Romanoff. That is the house 'Officially' belongs to. Also, the Template: Russian imperial family, I looked back and Grand Duke George's wife and son were not removed because they do not have pages of their own (although I do believe his wife should receive one of her own), and countless other templates have people on it without Wikipedia pages such as Template: Liechtensteiner princely family, Template: Luxembourger grand ducal family, Template: Parmesan royal family, Template: Dutch royal family, Template: Spanish royal family, Template: Swedish royal family, and I am sure there are more. Princess Victoria Romanovna and Prince Alexander Georgievich Romanov are members of the Russian Imperial House, at least Grand Duchess Maria's Branch. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 22:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing at that tumblr page about any orders. It's just a picture. Besides, Tumblr is a micro-blogging and social networking site, so it is deprecated under Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Self-published sources.

I see nothing wrong with the formatting at Lady Susan Hussey. I'm obviously experienced enough to know about the preview function, so trying to lecture me about it is itself rude.

The article says he claims to be in that house, which is the same as "considers himself to be". There is no official royal house of Russia. Russia is a republic without any state function for members of the former ruling family. That unlinked entries were removed because they do not have articles is extremely clear: "doesn't have his own article", "earlier consensus was to limit to people with articles", "earlier consensus was to limit to people with articles", "the edits in the page history of July 27, 2020 removed unlinked entries, which is why people like Prince Alexis Andreievich Romanov, one of the disputed heads of the family, is not included on the template". "delete unlinked entries". DrKay (talk) 07:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Order of the Aztec Eagle row is all messed up. The country is in the dates section, the date is in the Appointment section, The appointment is under the ribbon section, and the ribbon is in the Post-nominal letters. I have looked at the devices of multiple different people, and it's the same issue. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 22:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately, fixed by someone else[4]. DrKay (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I had been trying to say that this entire time. Not being rude, or trying to 'lecture' you, but tell you. JAMAMBTGE (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 07:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Countess of Snowdon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser block

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JAMAMBTGE (talk) 23:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]