User talk:J2globalwiki ed

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Evoicelogo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Evoicelogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to J2 Global Communications. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Evoicelogo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Evoicelogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evoicelogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evoicelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contested proposed deletion: Efax

I have contested your proposed deletion of Efax on the grounds that a primary topic is determined by consensus among Wikipedia editors, not by recognition by the USPTO. Your disclosed conflict of interest notwithstanding, I believe your proposal might have some merit, but I believe that even if consensus among editors swings in your favor, deletion is not the answer. I will make a move request shortly to outline where I believe specific pages should go if consensus agrees with your proposal. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 04:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply re Contested proposed deletion from User Kuyabribri

Thank you for your response and attention to this. I can appreciate the fact that USPTO designation does not necessarily define primary use in terms of Wikipedia editors. That said, a precedent has been set for the change I am requesting. One example: Kleenex. Kleenex is clearly a registered trademark that has become synonymous with use (for tissues). A Wikipedia search for "kleenex" does not direct to the disambiguation page for kleenex, but at the Kleenex (registered branded trademark) page with a hatnote at the top directing readers to other uses. Other examples of trademark brands where the search criteria directs to the primary use page (instead of a disambiguation page) include: zipper, yo yo, and thermos. We are simply asking that the search re-direct setup comply with standards set in other similar usages cases and direct to the eFax (fax service) page rather than the Efax disambiguation page. Thanks again for your attention to this.

Please read the last two sentences of my comment above, specifically where I said that "deletion is not the answer" and "I will make a move request". I have made such a request at Talk:eFax (fax service), in order to get a consensus among editors over which is the primary topic. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Hello J2globalwiki ed. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your username and comments suggest that this account is either used by or represents a company. Please note that usernames that represent groups or companies are prohibited by the username policy. You are welcome to create a username that represents only you by making a request at Wikipedia:Changing username; however, you are still strongly discouraged from editing articles with which you have a conflict of interest. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. I understand the conflict of interest guidelines with the current user account and will address this moving ahead as you suggest. Since the talk and discussion pages were fraught with squabbling and comments about the page not being helpful, we made an attempt to transparently clean up the issues that had been pointed out on the talk and discussion pages -- especially since there had been no attempts to do this or clean up for the last couple of years. We will shut down the direct company-related user account. J2globalwiki ed (talk) 22:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)j2globalwiki ed[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:J2 stacked.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:J2 stacked.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your changes to J2 Global, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "J2globalwiki ed", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website. Please note that Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or shared by multiple people. Please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 05:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]